Abstract
Even if different surgical approaches for total knee arthroplasty are well known since decades, the standard medial parapatellar incision remains the most common one; general agreement about significant advantages with minimally invasive techniques is lacking. Furthermore, the surgical stress effect on the organism has always been analyzed through blood inflammatory parameters. This study aim was to compare the standard and subvastus approaches, using the salivary cortisol in particular as measure for systemic surgery-related stress. Fifteen operations were performed in a consecutive series; clinical (Knee Society Knee Scoring System., a questionnaire score, range of motion, tourniquet time, intra-operative bleeding) and biochemical factors (salivary and hematic cortisol, C-reactive protein, muscular creatine phosphokinase levels) were evaluated. The final follow-up was at two months after the operation. No significant differences were observed in most of the parameters; however, the subvastus group had a sharper and earlier functional improvement trend than the standard one. On the other side, it increased the CPK levels significantly. In our experience, the medial subvastus approach, firstly associated with greater surgical stress, has then been characterized by a more favorable functional improvement trend. Moreover, the salivary cortisol measurement has proved to be a non-invasive and reliable method to evaluate the systemic surgery-related stress.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call