Abstract
Binge-Reviews? The Shifting Temporalities of Contemporary TV Criticism
Highlights
Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/communication_fac_pubs Part of the Critical and Cultural Studies Commons, and the Publishing Commons
When should television criticism happen? The answer used to be pretty simple for critics: reviews were published before a series premiered, with daily or weekly columns commenting on noteworthy storylines in a given series
It's only possible to do it at the end, and that's all I'm saying.”[3]. Critic Ken Tucker, argued in 2013 that such episodic reviews are “ a mug’s game—there is no way to maintain that kind of writing without becoming either burned out or a hack.”[4]. These concerns fell on deaf ears from a business perspective: episodic criticism dramatically multiplies the number of online articles published around a given series, driving weekly readership to sites and serving online-journalism business models
Summary
Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/communication_fac_pubs Part of the Critical and Cultural Studies Commons, and the Publishing Commons.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
