BIG Kids: Application of a modified brain injury guideline in a pediatric trauma center

Abstract

BackgroundBrain Injury Guidelines (BIG) were developed to stratify traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) by severity to decrease unnecessary CT imaging and neurosurgical consultation in low-risk cases. This study evaluated the potential effect of a modified pediatric BIG (pBIG) algorithm would have on resource utilization. MethodsIsolated TBIs (<18 years) were queried from our Pediatric Trauma Registry from 2017 to 2020. Injuries were classified as mild (pBIG 1), moderate (pBIG 2), or severe (pBIG 3) based on neurologic status, skull fractures, size, and the number of bleeds. Modifications from the institutional adult algorithm were upgrading <4 mm epidural hematomas to pBIG 2 and eliminating interfacility transfer as a pBIG 2 criteria. The proposed pBIG 1 and 2 care plans do not include routine repeat CTs or neurosurgical consultation. ResultsA total of 314 children with a mean age of 4.9 years were included. Skull fractures (213, 68%) and subdural hematomas (162, 52%) were the most common injuries. 89 (28%) children had repeat head CTs (2 (7%) pBIG 1, 26 (25%) pBIG 2, 61 (34%) pBIG 3). Neurosurgical consultation was obtained in 306 (98%), with 50 (16%) requiring intervention (1 (1%) pBIG 2 and 49 (27%) pBIG 3). Following the proposed pBIG would decrease neurosurgical consults to 181 (58%) and repeat CTs to 63 (20%). Following the algorithm, 91 (29%) kids would have been admitted to a higher level of care and 45 (14.3%) to a lower level. ConclusionsImplementation of our pBIG algorithm would decrease neurosurgery consults (40% reduction) and repeat head CTs (29% reduction).