Abstract

Stockholm Swedish has a distinction between so-called big accents and small accents (in addition to a lexical contrast between tone accent 1 and tone accent 2). The function and distribution of the big versus small accent has never been fully understood. West Germanic languages lack a corresponding distinction. While it is known that big accents appear on information-structural focus, this fact cannot account for all big accents, nor can it explain the existence of the big accent in relation to the domains of the prosodic hierarchy. In this article, the distribution of big accents in preverbal subjects is studied. A production study is presented where native speakers read sentences with preverbal subjects of four different lengths, with or without information-structural focus. Based on the results, it is argued that heads of prosodic phrases (φ) serve as hosts of big accents (one and only one big accent per φ). The rightmost big accent in the intonation phrase (ι) is referred to as the nuclear accent, and all other (non-rightmost) big accents are referred to as prenuclear accents. Heads of φ are aligned with the right edge of φ by default. However, the leftmost φ inside an ι may (non-obligatorily) be left-headed, causing a big accent to appear at the leftmost prosodic word (ω) of ι. Such left-aligned prenuclear accents are referred to as initiality accents. These assumptions regarding the big accent in Stockholm Swedish account for the large observed variation in terms of big accent distribution in the preverbal subjects.

Highlights

  • This section describes the big accents in the preverbal subjects

  • This article has reported the results of a production experiment where five speakers of Stockholm Swedish read 1200 sentences with NP subjects in clause-initial position

  • The experiment was designed to reveal the behavior of the so-called big accent in Stockholm Swedish, to generate a better understanding of this typologically uncommon phenomenon

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Swedish has a distinction between two tonally distinct types of pitch accents, tied to perceptually strong versus weak prominence. These will be referred to as big accents and small accents respectively.. It has been observed that the big accent contour appears regularly as a phrasing cue at some types of left edges, here referred to as initiality accents (Horne 1994; Roll, Horne & Lindgren 2009; Myrberg 2010; 2013b)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call