Abstract
Hypertension is known to decrease arterial distensibility and volumetric compliance, as reported from pressure-volume experiments and ring and strip studies of human and animal large arteries. However, recent data using noninvasive in vivo recording of vessel diameter suggest that the cross-sectional compliance of large arteries can be unchanged or even increased in hypertensive subjects. The present study was performed to test the hypothesis that differences between volumetric and cross-sectional compliance could be related to differences in biaxial mechanical properties in normotensive and hypertensive rats. In normotensive (Wistar-Kyoto [WKY]) rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) we measured the simultaneous changes in length and diameter of in situ isolated carotid arteries submitted to static pressures (50 to 200 mm Hg by steps of 25 mm Hg each). Carotid artery diameters and lengths were determined by video microscopy and computer-assisted image analysis. At low transmural pressure (50 mm Hg), carotid artery diameter was 710 +/- 41 microns in WKY rats and 980 +/- 31 microns in SHR (P < .01). In response to pressure increases, the carotid diameter increased by 91 +/- 6% in WKY rats and by 41 +/- 4% in SHR (P < .01). In parallel, the percent increase in carotid length was much larger in WKY rats than in SHR (31 +/- 2% versus 7 +/- 1%, respectively; P < .01). In WKY rats, longitudinal distensibility causes significantly larger volumetric values than cross-sectional compliance values; in contrast, because of the very small longitudinal distensibility, volumetric and cross-sectional compliances are almost identical in SHR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.