Abstract

Typologies (like ‘market system’, ‘school system’ or ‘dual-cooperative system’ of vocational education and training (VET)) promise to provide a general overview over the main characteristics of a particular VET system. However, comparing VET systems by typologies has been criticised as prejudice-driven because such typologies are often not the result of a comparison between national VET systems but rather their starting point. Moreover, through typologies a unity is assigned to VET systems, which often does not exist in reality.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call