Abstract

A great deal of popular commentary during the 2008 presidential election focused on the expansiveness of Barack Obama's campaign. He seemed to be not simply competing in the battleground states that defined the Bush elections but also aggressively contesting traditional Republican strongholds. We examine the particulars of both the Obama and McCain strategies for amassing Electoral College majorities, comparing them with those of other recent campaigns. We also estimate the extent to which the campaigns allocated their resources—television advertising dollars and visits from the candidates—in accord with these plans. Contrary to our initial expectation, the data suggest that Obama pursued a “mixed” strategy, one not all that different from the strategy adopted by Ronald Reagan in 1980 and 1984. In addition, there is overwhelming evidence that both Obama and McCain were careful to allocate resources in those states deemed most important to winning in the Electoral College.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.