Abstract

Multiplicity, when different phytolith morphotypes are produced within a taxon, and redundancy, when the same phytolith morphotypes are produced by different taxa, are persistent challenges in phytolith analysis. This article discusses and demonstrates how micromorphological and phytolith analyses of soil thin sections can be integrated to address issues of redundancy and multiplicity, as well as depositional history when studying archaeological soils and sediments.Opal phytoliths are created by the accumulation and precipitation of monosilicic acid (Si(OH)4) within plant tissues. Usually the process produces a variety of phytolith morphotypes with specific anatomical distribution within the plant tissues. When deposited in soil, phytoliths from decomposed plant tissue become microfossils of the plants in which they were produced. Decomposition or decay of plant tissue can take place either before or after it is incorporated into the soil matrix. When decay takes place after plant tissue is incorporated into a soil matrix, the anatomical distribution of the phytoliths within the tissue is often preserved, if the soil has not been affected by post-burial disturbances. Typically, analysis of phytoliths in soil begins with removing the phytoliths from the soil using techniques such as heavy liquid floatation, thereby destroying much of the distribution pattern of the phytoliths within the matrix and losing potentially important data. Analysing phytoliths within soil thin sections is becoming a more frequently applied alternative to analysing phytoliths extracted from the soil. Thin sections preserve the distribution patterns of phytoliths within an archaeological deposit or soil and as such can help researchers answer questions concerning redundancy, multiplicity and depositional history.In this study we demonstrate how the integration of phytolith analysis with micromorphological analysis of a series of thin sections made from Brussels urban archaeological deposits that have complex and multiphase formation histories can be used to differentiate phytoliths with different histories. The potential for improved botanical identification of the different groups of phytoliths is also discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.