Abstract

Redundancy has been referred to as a state of no longer being needed or useful. Microbiologists often theorize that the only case of true redundancy in a haploid organism would be a recent gene duplication event, prior to divergence through selective pressure. However, a growing number of examples exist where an organism encodes two genes that appear to perform the same function. For example, many pathogens translocate multiple effector proteins into hosts. While disruption of individual effector genes does not result in a discernable phenotype, deleting genes in combination impairs pathogenesis: this has been described as redundancy. In many cases, this apparent redundancy could be due to limitations of laboratory models of pathogenesis that do not fully recapitulate the disease process. Alternatively, it is possible that the selective advantage achieved by this perceived redundancy is too subtle to be measured in the laboratory. Moreover, there are numerous possibilities for different types of redundancy. The most common and recognized form of redundancy is functional redundancy whereby two proteins have similar biochemical activities and substrate specificities allowing each one to compensate in the absence of the other. However, redundancy can also exist between seemingly unrelated proteins that manipulate the same or complementary host cell pathways. In this article, we outline 5 types of redundancy in pathogenesis: molecular, target, pathway, cellular process, and system redundancy that incorporate the biochemical activities, the host target specificities and the impact of effector function on the pathways and cellular process they modulate. For each type of redundancy, we provide examples from Legionella pathogenesis as this organism employs over 300 secreted virulence proteins and loss of individual proteins rarely impacts intracellular growth. We also discuss selective pressures that drive the maintenance of redundant mechanisms, the current methods used to resolve redundancy and features that distinguish between redundant and non-redundant virulence mechanisms.

Highlights

  • Redundancy has been referred to as a state of no longer being needed or useful

  • While disruption of individual effector genes does not result in a discernable phenotype, deleting genes in combination impairs pathogenesis: this has been described as redundancy

  • For each type of redundancy, we provide examples from Legionella pathogenesis as this organism employs over 300 secreted virulence proteins and loss of individual proteins rarely impacts intracellular growth

Read more

Summary

Redundancy in Bacterial Pathogenesis

A classic example of genetic redundancy occurs in metabolism, where two genes encode proteins that catalyze the same reaction (Toda et al, 1987). Two proteins or sets of proteins with different catalytic activities can generate the same product (Wagner, 2000). The ability to synthesize a molecule de novo and the ability to acquire that molecule from the environment is a form redundancy. In this case, the proteins and their functions are completely unrelated but they serve a common goal. Redundancy can occur at multiple levels within a system and is largely defined by what a bacterium is trying to accomplish

REDUNDANCY IN MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS
REDUNDANCY IN LEGIONELLA PATHOGENESIS
TYPES OF REDUNDANCY
Molecular Redundancy
Target Redundancy
Pathway Redundancy
Cellular Process Redundancy
System Redundancy
SELECTIVE PRESSURES DRIVING THE MAINTENANCE OF REDUNDANT VIRULENCE PROTEINS
WHEN REDUNDANCY IS NOT REDUNDANCY AT ALL
TO RESOLVE REDUNDANCY
Genome Reduction and Minimal Effector Repertoires
Effector Interactome Mapping
Findings
Can Predict Redundant Virulence
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.