Abstract

Analysis of between-group differences using canonical variates assumes equality of population covariance matrices. Sometimes these matrices are sufficiently different for the null hypothesis of equality to be rejected, but there exist some common features which should be exploited in any analysis. The common principal component model is often suitable in such circumstances, and this model is shown to be appropriate in a practical example. Two methods for between-group analysis are proposed when this model replaces the equal dispersion matrix assumption. One method is by extension of the two-stage approach to canonical variate analysis using sequential principal component analyses as described by Campbell and Atchley (1981). The second method is by definition of a distance function between populations satisfying the common principal component model, followed by metric scaling of the resulting between-populations distance matrix. The two methods are compared with each other and with ordinary canonical variate analysis on the previously introduced data set.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call