Abstract
AbstractThis article puts forward a philosophical interpretation of Bettina von Arnim's epistolary bookDie Günderode, in the following stages. First I situate von Arnim's work in relation to women's participation in early German Romanticism and idealism. The ideal ofSymphilosophie, which was integral to Romantic epistemology, created possibilities for women to participate in philosophical discussion, albeit not on equal terms with men. This suggested that perhapsSymphilosophiebetween women could be more equal and reciprocal. However, interpreters have considered theSym-in Günderrode and von Arnim'sSymphilosophiemore than the-philosophie, whereas here I foregroundDie Günderode's rich philosophical content. I trace the stages in the unfolding dialogue between Günderrode and von Arnim and identify von Arnim's philosophical standpoint as it emerges from this dialogue. For Günderrode, finite beings are attracted together and can only fully unite by dying and superseding their boundaries. This feeds into a gigantic cosmic process through which the earth spiritualizes itself, progressively transcending its own materiality. Von Arnim likewise thinks that all finite beings are dynamically interconnected within the earth's creative process. But, unlike Günderrode, von Arnim thinks that finite beings can realize their interconnectedness within life without needing to die, which means in turn that material nature can rise into successive levels of spirit without its materiality having to be superseded. This metaphysical difference orchestrates many other philosophical disagreements between the two women. I then conclude that on balance, and with significant qualifications,Die Günderodeembodies a successfulSymphilosophiebetween women, but that von Arnim is simultaneously pointing out the fragility ofSymphilosophie. The more independence dialogue partners have, the more liable they are to move away in new directions and abandon or outgrow the conversation, just as Günderrode turns away from von Arnim by the end of the book.
Highlights
In this article I put forward a philosophical interpretation of Bettina von Arnim’s epistolary book Die Günderode (1840).1 The book recounts the story of the real-lifeDownloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. 02 Nov 2021 at 12:50:37, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use.dialogue between von Arnim and her close friend Karoline von Günderrode in the 1800s, using letters and writings that they exchanged at the time.2 Through this dialogue von Arnim articulates her philosophical standpoint in response to Günderrode’s
Von Arnim likewise thinks that all finite beings are dynamically interconnected within the earth’s creative process
Unlike Günderrode, von Arnim thinks that finite beings can realize their interconnectedness within life without needing to die, which in turn means that material nature can rise into successive levels of spirit while remaining material
Summary
In this article I put forward a philosophical interpretation of Bettina von Arnim’s epistolary book Die Günderode (1840). The book recounts the story of the real-life. Unlike Günderrode, von Arnim thinks that finite beings can realize their interconnectedness within life without needing to die, which in turn means that material nature can rise into successive levels of spirit while remaining material This metaphysical disagreement orchestrates the two women’s disagreements about many other philosophical topics. I conclude that on balance, and with significant qualifications, it does, but that von Arnim is simultaneously pointing out the fragility of Symphilosophie
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have