Abstract
Specific binding between proteins plays a crucial role in molecular functions and biological processes. Protein binding interfaces and their atomic contacts are typically defined by simple criteria, such as distance-based definitions that only use some threshold of spatial distance in previous studies. These definitions neglect the nearby atomic organization of contact atoms, and thus detect predominant contacts which are interrupted by other atoms. It is questionable whether such kinds of interrupted contacts are as important as other contacts in protein binding. To tackle this challenge, we propose a new definition called beta (β) atomic contacts. Our definition, founded on the β-skeletons in computational geometry, requires that there is no other atom in the contact spheres defined by two contact atoms; this sphere is similar to the van der Waals spheres of atoms. The statistical analysis on a large dataset shows that β contacts are only a small fraction of conventional distance-based contacts. To empirically quantify the importance of β contacts, we design βACV, an SVM classifier with β contacts as input, to classify homodimers from crystal packing. We found that our βACV is able to achieve the state-of-the-art classification performance superior to SVM classifiers with distance-based contacts as input. Our βACV also outperforms several existing methods when being evaluated on several datasets in previous works. The promising empirical performance suggests that β contacts can truly identify critical specific contacts in protein binding interfaces. β contacts thus provide a new model for more precise description of atomic organization in protein quaternary structures than distance-based contacts.
Highlights
Specific binding between proteins plays a fundamental role in molecular functions and biological processes
Protein binding is found to be driven by forces from those atomic contacts such as hydrogen bonds, electrostatic interactions, van der Waals forces, salt bridges, hydrophobic attractions, etc
Comparison of b atomic contacts with distance-based atomic contacts To demonstrate that b contacts are better than distance-based contacts in describing protein binding interfaces, we compare these two types of definitions from the following aspects
Summary
Specific binding between proteins plays a fundamental role in molecular functions and biological processes. In order to uncover contributing factors to specific interactions, binding interfaces and their contacts are firstly quantified according to several widely-used criteria: some definitions consider atomic distance between atoms each from one protein [1,2,3,4,5,6,7], while another more complicated definition takes into account Voronoi diagrams of entire complexes [8,9,10,11,12,13]; the other criterion defines binding interfaces using the change of solvent accessible surface area (DASA) upon the formation of protein complexes [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21] Under these definitions, protein binding is found to be driven by forces from those atomic contacts such as hydrogen bonds, electrostatic interactions, van der Waals forces, salt bridges, hydrophobic attractions, etc. With crystal packing as the reference state, a perfect contact definition is expected to satisfy that no or fewer contacts are detected in crystal packing; based on this definition, crystal packing should be distinguished from specific biological binding of proteins using a simple learning algorithm
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have