Besondere und traditionelle stationäre Betreuung demenzkranker Menschen im Vergleich

Abstract

Recent studies reveal that approximately two thirds of the residents in German nursing homes suffer from some type of moderate to severe dementia. In addition to cognitive impairments, other psychiatric symptoms and behavior problems frequently impact the quality of life of the affected residents, their fellow residents and the nursing staff. Novel concepts of nursing care for dementia patients with behavior problems have been developed against this backdrop, e. g. within the framework of the program of special care for dementia patients in Hamburg. A comprehensive course study (follow-up period: approximately six months) of a sample population of nursing home residents and consecutive admissions focused upon:the degree to which the quality of life and care for dementia patients in Hamburg differs according to the type of care given, i. e. segregative (domus philosophy), or partially segregative (integration philosophy), and the differences between the special care of dementia patients as provided in Hamburg, as opposed to the traditionally integrative care of dementia patients as practiced in the city of Mannheim. In order to gain the most complete picture possible-also for persons with severe cognitive impairments-information was collected primarily on the basis of the assessments made by qualified nursing staff. In the city of Hamburg there were advantages and disadvantages, respectively, between segregative care (domus philosophy) and partially segregative care (integration philosophy): the activity rates were higher for care in integrative than in domus environments, and could be maintained better over time. Moreover, the number of visits from relatives and their involvement in the nursing and social care was also higher for the integrative, as opposed to the domus setting. Among the residents of domus-care homes, however, significantly more biographical information was collected, and the proportion of dementia patients receiving gerontopsychiatric care also was higher. Dementia patients in these homes also received more psychotropic medication, with antidementia drugs and antidepressants being prescribed significantly more frequently and antipsychotic drugs less frequently.The comparison of the special dementia care available in Hamburg with the traditional, integrative care available to dementia patients in Mannheim revealed a number of visible indicators for the quality of life that point in favor of the model program in Hamburg. This is apparent in the more frequent expression of positive feelings, the greater number of activities fostering competency, the significant involvement of relatives and volunteers, the greater number of social contacts with the staff, fewer use of physical restraint, and better gerontopsychiatric care. Contradictory to our expectation, however, dementia patients cared for in the traditional setting exhibited fewer behavior problems over time than did their counterparts cared for within the framework of the Hamburg model.