Abstract

This multi-year pilot study evaluated a proposed field method for its effectiveness in the collection of a benthic macroinvertebrate sample adequate for use in the condition assessment of streams and rivers in the Neuquén Province, Argentina. A total of 13 sites, distributed across three rivers, were sampled. At each site, benthic macroinvertebrates were collected at 11 transects. Each sample was processed independently in the field and laboratory. Based on a literature review and resource considerations, the collection of 300 organisms (minimum) at each site was determined to be necessary to support a robust condition assessment, and therefore, selected as the criterion for judging the adequacy of the method. This targeted number of organisms was collected at all sites, at a minimum, when collections from all 11 transects were combined. Subsequent bootstrapping analysis of data was used to estimate whether collecting at fewer transects would reach the minimum target number of organisms for all sites. In a subset of sites, the total number of organisms frequently fell below the target when fewer than 11 transects collections were combined.Site conditions where < 300 organisms might be collected are discussed. These preliminary results suggest that the proposed field method results in a sample that is adequate for robust condition assessment of the rivers and streams of interest. When data become available from a broader range of sites, the adequacy of the field method should be reassessed.

Highlights

  • Effective management of riverine ecosystems requires the assessment and evaluation of river condition, using surveys and other direct measures, to determine the anthropogenic impacts to ecosystem structure and function (Parsons et al, 2016)

  • The study aimed to answer the question—does the proposed benthic macroinvertebrate field method result in a sample that collected the number of organisms targeted by the program?

  • Sampling 11 transects at each of the 13 sites in this study resulted in a total of 143 samples, each of which was independently-processed in the field and laboratory (Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Effective management of riverine ecosystems requires the assessment and evaluation of river condition, using surveys and other direct measures, to determine the anthropogenic impacts to ecosystem structure and function (Parsons et al, 2016). River assessment commonly includes some type of monitoring mandated as part of government programs or legislation (Lindenmayer and Likens, 2010). Chemical, hydrological, and/or physical elements of river ecosystems through time to determine trends in river condition and detect environmental harm. This information is, in turn, used by resource managers to effectively manage the riverine systems

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call