Benchmarking laser scanning and terrestrial photogrammetry to extract forest inventory parameters in a complex temperate forest

Abstract

National forest inventories (NFI) are important for the assessment of the state and development of forests. Traditional NFIs often rely on statistical sampling approaches as well as expert assessment which may suffer from observer bias and may lack robustness for time series analysis. Over the course of the last decade, close-range remote sensing techniques such as terrestrial and mobile laser scanning became ever more established for the assessment of three-dimensional (3D) forest structure. With the ongoing trend to make the systems smaller, easier to use and more efficient, the pathway is being opened for an operational inclusion of such devices within the framework of an NFI to support the traditional field assessment. Close-range remote sensing could potentially speed up field inventory work as well as increase the area in which certain parameters are assessed. Benchmarks are needed to evaluate the performance of different close-range remote sensing devices and approaches, both in terms of efficiency as well as accuracy. In this study we evaluate the performance of two terrestrial (TLS), one handheld mobile (PLS) and two drone based (UAVLS) laser scanning systems to detect trees and extract the diameter at breast height (DBH) in three plots with a steep gradient in tree and understorey vegetation density. As a novelty, we also tested the acquisition of 3D point-clouds using a low-cost action camera (GoPro) in conjunction with the Structure from Motion (SfM) technique and compared its performance with those of the more costly LiDAR devices. Among the many parameters evaluated in traditional NFIs, the focus of the performance evaluation of this study is set on the automatic tree detection and DBH extraction. The results showed that TLS delivers the highest tree detection rate (TDR) of up to 94.6% under leaf-off and up to 82% under leaf-on conditions and a relative RMSE (rRMSE) for the DBH extraction between 2.5 and 9%, depending on the undergrowth complexity. The tested PLS system (leaf-on) achieved a TDR of up to 80% with an rRMSE between 3.7 and 5.8%. The tested UAVLS systems showed lowest TDR of less than 77% under leaf-off and less than 37% under leaf-on conditions. The novel GoPro approach achieved a TDR of up to 53% under leaf-on conditions. The reduced TDR can be explained by the reduced area coverage due to the chosen circular acquisition path taken with the GoPro approach. The DBH extraction performance on the other hand is comparable to those of the LiDAR devices with an rRMSE between 2 and 9%. Further benchmarks are needed in order to fully assess the applicability of these systems in the framework of an NFI. Especially the robustness under varying forest conditions (seasonality) and over a broader range of forest types and canopy structure has to be evaluated.