Abstract
Discrediting the sources of messages attacking cultural truisms provided an effective belief defense which also bolstered the efficacy of a refutational defense and a supportive defense. The arguments in the attacking messages were rated less fair and less believable when attributed to a discredited source, but there were no differences in comprehension of arguments from credible and discredited sources.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.