Abstract

The thermal characteristics of outdoor urban spaces and the street networks connecting them are vital to the assessment of the liveability and sustainability of cities. When urban spaces are thermally comfortable, city dwellers spend more time outdoors. This has several benefits for human health and wellbeing, also reducing indoor energy consumption and contributing to local economy. Studies on outdoor thermal comfort have highlighted the need to develop interdisciplinary frameworks that integrate physical, physiological, psychological, and social parameters to assist urban planners and designers in design decisions. In this paper, an extensive literature review of outdoor thermal comfort studies over the past decade was undertaken, including both rational and adaptive thermal comfort approaches, from the contextualize the behaviour perspectives related to the use of urban space. Consequently, the paper suggests a comprehensive framework for evaluating the relationship between the quantitative and qualitative parameters linking the microclimatic environment with subjective thermal assessment and social behaviour. The framework aims to contribute to the development of exclusive thermal comfort standards for outdoor urban settings.

Highlights

  • The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2018) warns that anthropogenic activities have caused a rise of around 1 ◦ C in global warming

  • The framework considers the human being in the centre of the process as an active recipient of environmental stimuli [29]. These adaptive methods were included in thermal comfort standards, such as ASHRAE 55, 2017, British Standard (BS EN 15251:2007, BS EN 16798-2), and other international standards, to fulfil the limitations associated with the steady-state approach

  • For the in situ field measurements, the main objective of a site survey is to capture the urban geometry and materials in terms of how they impact the local climate within the urban canopy layer (UCL); this cannot be extracted from meteorological weather data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2018) warns that anthropogenic activities have caused a rise of around 1 ◦ C in global warming. Urban environments present a higher threat of thermal stress than rural environments, around evening time This phenomenon is referred to as an urban heat island (UHI) [11,12,13,14,15]. The application of these principles fits poorly with different climatic, cultural, and economic contexts, leading to uncomfortable local outdoor conditions [23,24] In this context, the paper critically assess the outdoor thermal comfort studies literature from a behavioural point of view, including common evaluation techniques and outdoor thermal comfort studies, paying particular attention to perceptions of outdoor thermal comfort and the use of outdoor space in the context of urban planning. The identification of knowledge gaps is followed by the proposal of a comprehensive framework for examining the behavioural aspect of outdoor thermal comfort

Thermal Comfort Theories
Thermal Comfort
Steady-State Evaluation
Non-Steady-State Evaluation Approaches
Conclusions
Methods and Limitations
Instruments and Methods
Phase Two
Phase Three
Phase Four
Findings

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.