Abstract

The current practices regarding the procurement chain of forest industry sidestreams, such as conifer bark, do not always lead to optimal conditions for preserving individual chemical compounds. This study investigates the standard way of storing bark in large piles in an open area. We mainly focus on the degradation of the most essential hydrophilic and hydrophobic extractives and carbohydrates. First, two large 450 m3 piles of bark from Norway spruce (Picea abies) were formed, one of which was covered with snow. The degradation of the bark extractives was monitored for 24 weeks. Samples were taken from the middle, side and top of the pile. Each sample was extracted at 120 °C with both n-hexane and water, and the extracts produced were then analysed chromatographically using gas chromatography with flame ionisation or mass selective detection and high-performance liquid chromatography. The carbohydrates were next analysed using acidic hydrolysis and acidic methanolysis, followed by chromatographic separation of the monosaccharides formed and their derivatives. The results showed that the most intensive degradation occurred during the first 4 weeks of storage. The levels of hydrophilic extractives were also found to decrease drastically (69% in normal pile and 73% in snow-covered pile) during storage, whereas the decrease in hydrophobic extractives was relatively stable (15% in normal pile and 8% in snow-covered pile). The top of the piles exhibited the most significant decrease in the total level of extractives (73% in normal and snow-covered pile), whereas the bark in the middle of the pile retained the highest amount of extractives (decreased by 51% in normal pile and 47% in snow-covered pile) after 24-week storage.

Highlights

  • Bark contains the great majority of the hydrophilic extractives present in conifers, and it is produced as various forestry sidestreams annually on a massive scale

  • We mainly focus on the degradation of the most essential hydrophilic and hydrophobic extractives and carbohydrates

  • Two large 450 m3 piles of bark from Norway spruce (Picea abies) were formed, one of which was covered with snow

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bark contains the great majority of the hydrophilic extractives present in conifers, and it is produced as various forestry sidestreams annually on a massive scale. Stilbenes (especially resveratrol) and tannins have multiple commercial applications highlighting their protective and health benefits [2,3] Extracting these crucial compounds with suitable solvents followed by purification is considered an industrially attractive approach. It seems evident that such a form of storage has many advantages, as compared to pile storage, in preserving extractives in bark. This is understandable, as a smaller particle size (as in pile storage) generally exposes the chemical compounds to more degrading factors. The information gathered in this study facilitates the decision-making process regarding the optimisation of storage conditions for the preservation of extractives needed in the manufacture of value-added products

Overview of the Change in the Chemical Composition of Bark during Storage
Heating Values of Stored Bark
Lipophilic and Hydrophilic Extractive Groups
Resin Acids
Diterpenoids
2.3.10. Flavonoids
Chemicals
ASE Extraction
Quantitative Analysis of Bark Extracts by GC-FID
Carbohydrate Analyses
Acid Hydrolysis
UV–Vis Measurement of Acid-Soluble Lignin
Acidic Methanolysis
Statistical Analysis
Conclusions
62. BS EN 14775
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call