Abstract
Signal models of rolling-element bearings have been a fundamental tool for the development and justification of new bearing signal processing techniques. A cyclostationary model proposed twenty years ago is still the most common reference for physically-justified bearing diagnostics. Surprisingly, a pseudo-cyclostationary bearing model proposed just a few years later has been almost entirely neglected. Moreover, the validity of the two models has not been tested against actual bearing signals, and there is limited knowledge about the quantitative effect of their parameters. This paper therefore aims at discussing the physical motivations of the two models, developing a single generalised model which includes the properties of both, and assessing the impact of key model parameters, corresponding to physical properties of the bearing, on the signal in the time and frequency domains. This work’s main novelties are analytical and include an assessment of truly- vs pseudo-cyclostationarity in rolling element bearing signals and of the relative importance of first- and second-order (pseudo-) cyclostationary fault symptoms. The first aspect sheds light on the spectral spread of bearing fault harmonics in both the spectrum and envelope-spectrum, while the second provides useful information for the selection of the best diagnostic indicator. Application of the model is illustrated on test-rig data using a bearing with an outer race fault.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have