Abstract

Despite use of GPS, lighthouses remain critical infrastructure for preserving safety of mariners and maritime trade, and the most dramatic examples are probably the Victorian era masonry towers located on remote offshore reefs around the British Isles and exposed to extreme weather conditions. Due to their age and likely increasing future loading, dynamic field investigations were undertaken for condition assessment. The field investigations of a sample of seven lighthouses had focused on experimental modal analysis (EMA) of shaker force and acceleration response data in order to identify sets of modal parameters (MPs) specifically including modal mass, which is useful for linking loading and response. However, the EMA missed significant useful information, which could be recovered from operational modal analysis (OMA) of additional ambient vibration data recorded during the field measurements, as well as from subsequent long-term monitoring of Wolf Rock lighthouse. Horizontal vibration modes of the towers appear as pairs of modes of similar shape and with close natural frequency due to the quasi-axisymmetric structural form(s), and the lowest frequency pairs are most important to identify since they contribute most to response to breaking wave impact loads. Reliably identifying both the close natural frequencies and the corresponding mode shape orientations was impossible with EMA. Bayesian OMA (BAYOMA) provided the most insight into the modal behaviour, while at the same time providing insight into the fundamental limitations for identifying close modes. Specific conclusions from the OMA described in this paper are: • Due to varying degree of asymmetry in the ‘concave elliptic frustum’ lighthouse shapes, mode frequencies in a pair were found to differ by between 0.75% and 3.8%. • Unlike EMA, OMA was able to identify (or estimate) the horizontal directions of the mode pairs corresponding to the very close natural frequencies. • Visually apparent structural symmetry may not be strongly linked to mode shape orientations. • Mode frequency variation over time may exceed -but is not accounted for in- the calculated identification uncertainty of MPs. • There is a trade-off between mode shape orientation uncertainty and closeness of frequencies in a close-mode pair.

Highlights

  • The field investigations of a sample of seven lighthouses had focused on experimental modal analysis (EMA) of shaker force and acceleration response data in order to identify sets of modal parameters (MPs) including modal mass, which is useful for linking loading and response

  • Rigid body rocking as was described by many lighthouse keepers should be impossible, and it has since been established at least for Wolf Rock [1] that the sensation observed is an interpretation of the impulsive elastic response of the structure to the impact of waves shaped by the reef bathymetry and breaking on the lighthouse

  • Following pilot studies [8] on Eddystone Lighthouse by researchers from the University of Plymouth, a research programme was initiated with aims to identify experimentally modal parameters (MPs) for a set of rock lighthouses, monitor and process structural response of at least one lighthouse over an extended period, develop structural models based on construction information and calibrated through dynamic testing and hydrodynamic experiments, investigate worst case hydrodynamic loading and formulate guidance on procedures for structural condition assessment and management based on objective structural performance data

Read more

Summary

Construction and structural arrangement of lighthouses

Rigid body rocking as was described by many lighthouse keepers should be impossible, and it has since been established at least for Wolf Rock [1] that the sensation observed is an interpretation of the impulsive elastic response of the structure to the impact of waves shaped by the reef bathymetry and breaking on the lighthouse. This means that assumptions of linearity apply and modal analysis procedures that assume linearity can be used to identify modal properties which themselves can be used for forward or backward analysis of loading and response. Fastnet and Dubh Artach have no helideck and have axisymmetry disrupted in different ways

Modal testing
Foundation arrangements and other factors on symmetry
Bayesian operational modal analysis: data and procedure
Bayesian operational modal analysis: results
Mode directionality
Time varying modal parameter identification
Findings
10. Observations and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call