Abstract

This study focuses on the estimation of uncertainty associated with the stress/strain prediction procedures from dynamic test data of structural systems. An accurate prediction of the maximum response levels for physical components during in-field operating conditions is essential for evaluating their performance and life characteristics, as well as for investigating their behavior in light of system design and reliability assessment. Stress/strain inference for a dynamic system is based on the combination of experimental data and results from the analytical/numerical model of the component under consideration. Both modeling challenges and testing limitations contribute to the introduction of various sources of uncertainty within the given estimation procedure with consequent reduced confidence in the predicted response. The objective of this work is to quantify the uncertainties present in the current response estimation process by means of a Bayesian-network representation of the modeling process which allows for a rigorous synthesis of modeling assumptions and information from experimental data, as it takes into account the multi-directional nature of uncertainty propagation. More specifically, the focus is on the residual uncertainty associated with the system's inferred response, and its dependence upon the amount of test data being included in the estimation analysis. Both discrete and linear Gaussian networks were investigated with a focus on their training accuracy and performance in the presence of nonlinear relationships among the physical quantities, weak cause–effect nodal links, as well as different sensitivity levels with respect to infused evidence.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.