Abstract

Screening designs are frequently used in the initial stages of experimentation with the goal of identifying important main effects as well as to gain insight on potentially important two-factor interactions. Commonly utilized experimental designs for screening are unreplicated and as such, provide no unbiased estimate of experimental error. However, if statistical inference is to be performed as part of the experimental analysis, one view is that inferential procedures should be performed using a model independent error estimate instead of the residual mean square from the fitted model. As full replication of an experiment may be quite costly, partial replication offers an alternative. Gilmour and Trinca (2012) introduce criteria for constructing optimal designs for statistical inference (and hence, provide for optimal selection of replicate design points). An extension of their work is introduced by modifying the popular Bayesian D-optimality criterion to construct partially replicated screening designs with less dependence on an assumed model. Designs are compared using various criteria and a simulation study is conducted to investigate design performance with respect to power and false discovery rates.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.