Abstract

AbstractThe relationships between large‐scale depositional processes and the stratigraphic record of alluvial systems, e.g. the origin and distribution of channel stacking patterns, changing architecture and correlation of strata, are still relatively poorly understood, in contrast to marine systems. We present a study of the Castillian Branch of the Permo‐Triassic Central Iberian Basin, north‐eastern Spain, using chemostratigraphy and a detailed sedimentological analysis to correlate the synrift Triassic fluvial sandstones for ~80 km along the south‐eastern basin margin. This study investigates the effects of Middle Triassic (Ladinian) Tethyan marine transgression on fluvial facies and architecture. Chemostratigraphy identifies a major, single axially flowing fluvial system lasting from the Early to Middle Triassic (~10 Ma). The fluvial architecture comprises basal conglomerates, followed by amalgamated sandstones and topped by floodplain‐isolated single‐ or multi‐storey amalgamated sandstone complexes with a total thickness up to ~1 km. The Tethyan marine transgression advanced into the basin with a rate of 0.04–0.02 m/year, and is recorded by a transition from the fluvial succession to a series of maximum flooding surfaces characterised by marginal marine clastic sediments and sabkha evaporites. The continued, transgression led to widespread thick carbonate deposition infilling the basin and recording the final stage of synrift to early‐post‐rift deposition. We identify the nonmarine to marine transition characterised by significant changes in the Buntsandstein succession with a transition from a predominantly tectonic‐ to a climatically driven fluvial system. The results have important implications for the temporal and spatial prediction of fluvial architecture and their transition during a marine transgression.

Highlights

  • This study describes the fluvial stratigraphic responses to marine transgression in the Central Iberian Basin (CIB), Spain, before and during the Middle Triassic (Ladinian), with the aim of understanding how and why fluvial architecture changed over time

  • We argue that the Tethyan marine transgression is accompanied by a transition from a predominantly tectonic- to a climatically-driven fluvial system

  • The samples were prepared for geochemical analysis following Jarvis and Jarvis (1992a, 1992b); Pearce et al (1999) and Pearce, Wray, Ratcliffe, Wright, and Moscariello (2005) and were analysed by Inductively-Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) and Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS), with quantitative data being acquired for 48 elements of which 10 are major oxides (Si, Ti, Al, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ca, Na, K and P), 24 are trace elements (Ba, Be, Co, Cr, Cs, Cu, Ga, Hf, Mo, Nb, Ni, Rb, Sc, Sn, Sr, Ta, Tl, Th, U, V, W, Y, Zn and Zr) and 14 are rare-earth elements (La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Ho, Dy, Er, Tm, Yb and Lu)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study describes the fluvial stratigraphic responses to marine transgression in the Central Iberian Basin (CIB), Spain, before and during the Middle Triassic (Ladinian), with the aim of understanding how and why fluvial architecture changed over time.Stratal geometries and the distribution of depositional systems in paralic settings record differences in sedimentary processes and basin development as sea level changes (e.g. Burns, Heller, Marzo, & Paola, 1997; Posamentier, Jervey, & Vail, 1988; Posamentier & Vail, 1988). Stratal geometries and the distribution of depositional systems in paralic settings record differences in sedimentary processes and basin development as sea level changes Relationships between large-scale depositional processes and the stratigraphic record are relatively well understood for marine deposits, but less so for fluvial systems. The maximum extent and geometry of the coastal onlap during a marine transgression is controlled by the amount and rate of accommodation space creation upstream of the shoreline and direct competition with sediment supply of the fluvial system. It is important to understand how deposition of the fluvial sediments responds to changes in relative sea level, to inform models of fluvial and coastal plain facies distribution and connectivity used for hydrocarbon exploration, carbon capture and storage and aquifer studies

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call