Basic principles underlying a legislative framework for vegetable protein.

Abstract

AbstractNew food products appear on the market every day in one country or another. Provided they conform to the food laws currently in operation, there are no obstacles to the sale of such foods. The question is asked as to why special provisions are sought for or are needed to enable foods based on vegetable protein products to be marketed. The discussion given mainly centers on developed countries with “Western” type diets; developing countries and countries with traditional soy products are briefly mentioned. The four main viewpoints, of which account has to be taken, are outlined. These originate from the consumer, the manufacturer, the government regulatory and health authorities, and finally the enforcement authority where this is independent of the regulatory authority. Each of these contribute, in differing degree, to the questions of safety as regards health, nutritional adequacy, labeling and absence of deception, and the ability to enforce such regulations as may be needed. The extent to which a system of regulations formulated to meet the various safeguards asked for by one or other group still offers scope for commercially viable products is discussed. There may be conflict between the attitude of some manufacturers anxious for rapid commercial success linked with the measures which would satisfy their requirements and the long term development of vegetable protein products as an accepted sector of the food market. Indications are given of what might constitute a framework for legislation.