Abstract
Introduction: The efficacy of combined-modality treatment (Tx) with chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) in early-stage Hodgkin Lymphoma (eHL) is offset by long-term morbidity, with a cumulative incidence of 2nd primary malignancy at 40 years of 48.5% (Schaapveld 2015). The RAFTING trial (NCT Id. 04866654) is a phase-2 prospective single-cohort international study to explore the effectiveness of a risk-adapted Tx in non-bulky stage I-IIA eHL, based on the risk of CT failure (TxF) in a single-patient (p.) basis and in a personalized medicine design. Methods: p. are first stratified in 3 classes of TxF risk, depending on (a) modified EORTC criteria (m-EORTC), in which bulky is replaced by a Large Nodal Mass (LNM), defined by a longest ∅ measuring ≥5 cm in CT or PET/CT, (b) Metabolic Tumor Volume (MTV), with a SUVmax threshold method of 41% and cutoff value of 84 ml, and (c) PET-2 result (5-point scale). Tx stratification: Group 1: PET-2 neg. & low MTV p., treated either with 2 (group 1a) or 4 (group 2b) ABVD depending on no or ≥1 m-EORTC criterion presence, addressed, once in CR, to a 3-monthly cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) assay (CAPPSeq. Method, Spina 2018); Group 2: group 1 p. with < CR after ABVD or in “limited” relapse (LR), defined by eHL relapse in old and up to 3 new nodal areas, addressed to Involved-Node RT (INRT) and Nivolumab (N), 240 mg. i.v. twice a month for 24 doses; Group 3: PET-2+ and/or high MTV p., treated with the triplet ABVD × 4, INRT, 20 or 30 Gy (A-RxT-N). All PET/CT scans are centrally reviewed by an expert panel. The trial primary endpoint is a 3-Y PFS ≥90% in group 1 p. The secondary endpoints are: (a) Effectiveness of RxT (36 Gy) and N (same schedule of Group 3), in rescue p. with LR (b) effectiveness of the triplet A-RxT-N in high-risk (Group 3) eHL; (c) predictive value of ctDNA in detecting an impending eHL relapse after CT alone. Results: Preliminary results of risk stratification upon enrolment of the first 104/180 (58%) of the pre-planned sample size: in a per-protocol analysis, 88/104 (85%) turned out eligible and 73 stratified for risk. Non-eligibility reasons were higher HL stage, or bulky (10 p.) and early Tx stop, for p./investigator decision: (6p.). Out of 73 p. stratified, 53 (73%) were low-risk (Group 1), and 20 (27%) high risk (Group 3). Out of 53 low-risk p., 16 were in Group 1a: one of them was addressed to salvage Tx with ASCT because of an extended relapse 3 months after CT end. As many as 37 (70%) of low-risk p. belonged to Group 1b, mostly because of the presence of a LNM; two of them had a LR (entering Group 2) and started RxT-N rescue. Twenty p. (27%) had high-risk disease, most (14) for a high MTV, and a minority (6) for a positive PET-2. Updated results will be presented. The research was funded by: Polish Medical Agency ABM Ongoing Trial Keywords: Liquid biopsy, Ongoing Trials, PET-CT No conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call