Abstract

The eastern oyster once provided major societal and ecosystem benefits, but these benefits have been threatened in recent years by major declines in oyster harvests. In many areas, recovery of oyster aquaculture faces significant societal opposition and spatial constraints limiting its ability to meet expectations regarding future food needs and provision of ecosystem services. In Virginia, oyster aquaculture has begun to rebound, concurrent with an increase in subaqueous leased areas (over 130,000 acres of grounds are currently leased). Though private leases must in theory be used for oyster production, in practice, they can be held for other reasons, such as speculation or intentional exclusion of others. These factors have led to large variation over time and space in the use of leases in the lower Chesapeake Bay, and privately leased grounds are now thought to be underutilized for oyster production. This research examined potential barriers to expansion of oyster aquaculture in Virginia. We first evaluated if a lack of space was limiting industry expansion and quantified temporal and spatial trends in the use and productivity of leases. Then, differences in used and non-used leases were investigated in relation to variables thought to be related to “not in my backyard” attitudes, congestion, speculation, local economic and environmental conditions. Finally, the performance of the Virginia leasing system was compared with those in other states along the U.S. East and Gulf Coasts. We found limited evidence of spatial constraints though strong evidence of social and regulatory inefficiencies. While rates of lease use increased from 2006 to 2016, only 33% of leases were ever used for oyster production and about 63% of leaseholders reported no commercial harvests. Non-used leases tended to be smaller, and were found in more populated, high-income regions, consistent with both speculative and exclusionary uses. Virginia was found to have the lowest levels of total production of cultured oysters per leased acre among the states of the eastern U.S. These results indicate that there is room for oyster aquaculture expansion in Virginia if societal, regulatory and economic barriers can be reduced or if existing leased areas are used more efficiently.

Highlights

  • As of 2018, aquaculture continues to be the fastest growing food production method worldwide and represents more than half of global human seafood consumption (Duarte et al, 2009; Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2018)

  • In Virginia, it is apparent from this study that there are numerous social inefficiencies and spatial conflicts regarding oyster private lease use

  • Whether they are due to NIMBY attitudes, speculation, or creation of buffer zones, these social attitudes and economic conditions appear to be associated with inefficiencies and non-use in the oyster aquaculture sector

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As of 2018, aquaculture continues to be the fastest growing food production method worldwide and represents more than half of global human seafood consumption (Duarte et al, 2009; FAO, 2018). The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) identifies the United States as one of the most prominent nations for marine aquaculture development in terms of coastline length and exclusive economic zone area (Kapetsky et al, 2013), its contribution to domestic demand is believed to be far below its potential (Knapp and Rubino, 2016). One identified reason is that coastal aquaculture faces significant social opposition and competition for space (Knapp, 2012; Froehlich et al, 2017). This paper looks at recent trends and drivers of growth in oyster aquaculture to identify possible societal, management, or spatial limits to expansion of the sector in Virginia, as well as more broadly

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.