Abstract

SUMMARY This paper discusses the two-sample test of location based on the comparison of two distribution-free one-sample confidence intervals derived from sign statistics. This test procedure, first introduced by Hettmansperger (1984), rejects the null hypothesis of equal population medians when the two intervals are disjoint. He presents three different ways to select the two one-sample intervals and one choice leads to Mood's test. All solutions have the same Pitman efficiency. This paper shows that the choices can be distinguished on the basis of Bahadur's efficiency. We formulate the problem in terms of (asymptotically) fixed width confidence intervals. In this context various median tests (including Mood's test) arise as special cases and they yield different performance. The solution that specifies equal asymptotic lengths for the one-sample intervals (which is different from Mood's test) is recommended.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.