Abstract

Abstract The article describes the findings of a cross‐phase study into boys' underachievement which investigated patterns of classroom interaction by boys and girls. The data illustrate how underachievers, of either gender, are the least likely group to be participating positively in the classroom and most likely to be engaged in off‐task interactions. The underachieving boys' reluctance to participate emerges in year 1, but by year 4 the underachieving girl is behaving in the same way. To a lesser extent, the older high‐achieving boy begins to exhibit similar interaction patterns to the underachievers. By contrast, the high‐achieving girl remains consistently actively participant and on‐task. The article questions the extent to which whole class teaching is benefiting the learning experience of underachievers and challenges the current tendency to construct underachievement in terms of gender.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.