Abstract
Backpressure (BP) control was originally used for packet routing in communications networks. Since its first application to network traffic control, it has undergone different modifications to tailor it to traffic problems with promising results. Most of these BP variants are based on an assumption of perfect knowledge of traffic conditions throughout the network at all times, specifically the queue lengths (more accurately, the traffic volumes). However, it has been well established that accurate queue length information at signalized intersections is never available except in fully connected environments. Although connected vehicle technologies are developing quickly, we are still far from a fully connected environment in the real world. This paper test the effectiveness of BP control when incomplete or imperfect knowledge about traffic conditions is available. We combine BP control with a speed/density field estimation module suitable for a partially connected environment. We refer to the proposed system as a BP with estimated queue lengths (BP-EQ). We test the robustness of BP-EQ to varying levels of connected vehicle penetration, and we compared BP-EQ with the original BP (i.e., assuming accurate knowledge of traffic conditions), a real-world adaptive signal controller, and optimized fixed timing control using microscopic traffic simulation with field calibrated data. Our results show that with a connected vehicle penetration rate as little as 10%, BP-EQ can outperform the adaptive controller and the fixed timing controller in terms of average delay, throughput, and maximum stopped queue lengths under high demand scenarios.
Highlights
Network traffic control can be classified into centralized and decentralized/distributed control [30]
We propose a method to feed the data provided by the connected vehicles in the network to the BP controller
The performance of BP with estimated queue lengths (BP-EQ) improves as the connected vehicles (CVs) penetration rates increase, but the marginal benefits keep decreasing; the biggest gain is obtained when the penetration rate increases from 10% to 20%
Summary
Network traffic control can be classified into centralized and decentralized/distributed control [30]. BP was initially proposed by Tassiulas and Ephremides [39] as a solution for the packet routing problem in communications networks It can be applied in a completely distributed manner while ensuring network-wide stability of the queues for all possible mean arrival rates that lie within the capacity region of the network. Another significant advantage of BP is that it requires no knowledge of network demands. It was first introduced into network traffic signal control by Wongpiromsarn et al [42] and Varaiya [41] independently about 7 years ago. The original BP has the following properties, which are not suitable for traffic control: 1. It involves frequent updates (every time step)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.