Back to reality: differences in learning strategy in a simplified virtual and a real throwing task.

Abstract

Virtual environments have been widely used in motor neuroscience and rehabilitation, as they afford tight control of sensorimotor conditions and readily afford visual and haptic manipulations. However, typically, studies have only examined performance in the virtual testbeds, without asking how the simplified and controlled movement in the virtual environment compares to behavior in the real world. To test whether performance in the virtual environment was a valid representation of corresponding behavior in the real world, this study compared throwing in a virtual set-up with realistic throwing, where the task parameters were precisely matched. Even though the virtual task only required a horizontal single-joint arm movement, similar to many simplified movement assays in motor neuroscience, throwing accuracy and precision were significantly worse than in the real task that involved all degrees of freedom of the arm; only after 3 practice days did success rate and error reach similar levels. To gain more insight into the structure of the learning process, movement variability was decomposed into deterministic and stochastic contributions. Using the tolerance-noise-covariation decomposition method, distinct stages of learning were revealed: While tolerance was optimized first in both environments, it was higher in the virtual environment, suggesting that more familiarization and exploration was needed in the virtual task. Covariation and noise showed more contributions in the real task, indicating that subjects reached the stage of fine-tuning of variability only in the real task. These results showed that while the tasks were precisely matched, the simplified movements in the virtual environment required more time to become successful. These findings resonate with the reported problems in transfer of therapeutic benefits from virtual to real environments and alert that the use of virtual environments in research and rehabilitation needs more caution.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study compared human performance of the same throwing task in a real and a matched virtual environment. With 3 days' practice, subjects improved significantly faster in the real task, even though the arm and hand movements were more complex. Decomposing variability revealed that performance in the virtual environment, despite its simplified hand movements, required more exploration. Additionally, due to fewer constraints in the real task, subjects could modify the geometry of the solution manifold, by shifting the release position, and thereby simplify the task.