Abstract
This paper discusses submarine morphology as a means of understanding the avulsion of the Fangliao canyon. Multichannel seismic profiles and bathymetric data were used to perform a morphological analysis. In response to tectonic uplifting, the Fangliao canyon was divided into two separate segments and two distinct trends. Initially, in the shelf edge–upper slope region the canyon extends downslope in a N–S direction. Then the canyon course bends to the SW at a depth of about 630m because of a mud diapir uplift and then returns to and maintains a N–S course with the canyon mouth at a depth of 900m, which is its present-day course. The Fangliao ridge, a mud diapiric ridge, lies east of the lower Fangliao canyon and extends upslope into the upper Fangliao canyon with a generally straight course and a nearly N–S trend. Because of the uplift of the Fangliao ridge a major step of the convex-upward profile, ~150m above the canyon floor, resulted in the east Fangliao ridge canyon. The gravity flows are unable to rise up against the high gradient and, thus, have had to abandon the segment of paleocanyon once flowing along the trend of the Fangliao ridge. The internal seismic characteristics of the terraces located along the eastern wall of the Fangliao canyon suggest deposition of terrace mainly occurs in the inner bend of the Fangliao canyon. The sedimentary sequences of the terrace are divided into two units: (1) the lower sedimentary unit is characterized by oblique, high-amplitude reflections and is considered as coarse-grained canyon fills resulting from aggradation related to the canyon avulsion events; and (2) the upper sedimentary unit consists mainly of low-amplitude reflections that are interpreted as inner levee resulting from spillover deposition. Numerical simulations were performed to discuss avulsion of the Fangliao canyon. Initially, the course of the Fangliao canyon had a N–S trend and followed the regional slope (i.e., the direction gravity currents would flow). Subsequently, the mud diapir uplifted the segment of the paleocanyon of the Fangliao canyon once flowing along the present-day Fangliao ridge and diverted its course to the present-day Fangliao canyon. The model suggests that the uplift rate exceeds the erosion rate in the east Fangliao ridge canyon, and hence the sediment flows in the canyon may be unable to pass through the 150-m major step. This new model suggests that the avulsion of the Fangliao canyon is marked by a significant bend at the boundary between the upper and lower canyons.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.