Abstract
IntroductionThis study investigated the performance of SPECT myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantitation lacking full physical corrections (All Corr) in dynamic SPECT (DySPECT) images. MethodsEleven healthy normal volunteers (HVT) and twenty-four patients with angiography-documented CAD were assessed. All Corr in 99mTc-sestamibi DySPECT encompassed noise reduction (NR), resolution recovery (RR), and corrections for scatter (SC) and attenuation (AC), otherwise no correction (NC) or only partial corrections. The performance was evaluated by quality index (R2) and blood-pool spillover index (FBV) in kinetic modeling, and by rest flow (RMBF) and stress flow (SMBF) compared with those of All Corr. ResultsIn HVT group, NC diminished 2-fold flow uniformity with the most degraded quality (15%-18% reduced R2) and elevated spillover effect (45%-50% increased FBV). Consistently higher RMBF and SMBF were discovered in both groups (HVT 1.54/2.31 higher; CAD 1.60/1.72; all P < .0001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed positive flow bias (HVT 0.9-2.6 mL/min/g; CAD 0.7-1.3) with wide ranges of 95% CI of agreement (HVT NC −1.9-7.1; NR −0.4-4.4; NR + SC −1.1-4.3; NR + SC + RR −0.7-2.5) (CAD NC −1.2-3.8; NR −1.0-2.8; NR + SC −1.0-2.5; NR + SC + RR −1.1-2.6). ConclusionsUncorrected physical interference in DySPECT images can extensively impact the performance of MBF quantitation. Full physical corrections should be considered to warrant this tool for clinical utilization.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have