Abstract

We investigate different final state features in Mueller–Navelet jets events at hadron colliders. The focus lies on the average rapidity ratio between subsequent minijet emissions which has been investigated in previous works but now is modified to also incorporate the transverse momenta together with the rapidities of the emitted jets. We study the dependence of this observable on a lower transverse momentum veto which does affect the typical minijet multiplicity of the events under scrutiny. We find that this observable is stable when including higher order quantum corrections, also when collinear terms are resummed to all orders.

Highlights

  • An active area of research in QCD phenomenology at high energies is to pin down novel observables where the dominant contributions stem from the Balitsky–Fadin–Kuraev–Lipatov (BFKL) domain [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]

  • We investigate different final state features in Mueller–Navelet jets events at hadron colliders

  • The focus lies on the average rapidity ratio between subsequent minijet emissions which has been investigated in previous works but now is modified to incorporate the transverse momenta together with the rapidities of the emitted jets

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lipatov (BFKL) domain [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. This is a challenging task since for typical observables calculations based on matrix elements computed at fixed order along with the Dokshitzer–. One of the conclusions of the comparison to experimental data from different approaches is that a more precise theoretical work is needed (e.g. see [38]) This is more pressing recently since experimental uncertainties appear to be smaller than the theoretical ones and extra emphasis needs to be given in the theory side in order to have more accurate predictions. It is in this context that we present new observables which could be useful for this quest. With the present work we want to address the two issues just described in order to pave the path for a proper comparison between a full BFKL phenomenological analysis and experimental data for our proposed observables.

The observables
Results
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.