Abstract

ABSTRACT The characterization of intra- and interannual variations in optical satellite observations has proven to be effective to differentiate between land use classes. However, there is relatively little knowledge of the accuracy and usefulness of vario us satellite-based phenology variables and metrics. This letter provides quick insights into the processing of vegetation seasonality and phenology data, applied to the European Space Agency (ESA) Sentinel-2 satellite observations. The following time-series data methods were compared for their potential to enhance land use mapping in two study areas in Kenya and Tanzania: a) monthly maximum Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) composites, b) NDVI-based time-series statistics, c) NDVI-based harmonic regressions, and d) threshold-based NDVI-based phenological metrics. When using the maximum NDVI composites, as classification inputs, the overall accuracies were found to be 7–18% higher than when using the other methods (predictors). Overall, the Muranga site (Kenya) showed a higher classification accuracy for the best performing predictor set (overall accuracy = 86.5%) than the Kilimanjaro site (Tanzania) (overall accuracy = 80.9%). These findings confirm the potential of phenology-based compositing methods for large-scale mapping of agro-ecological farming systems.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call