Abstract
Poor first winter survival in Miscanthus × giganteus has been anecdotally attributed to incomplete first autumn senescence, but these assessments never paired first-year with older M. × giganteus in side-by-side trials to separate the effect of weather from stand age. Here CO2 assimilation rate (A), photosystem II efficiency (ΦPSII), and leaf N concentration ([N]) were used to directly compare senescence in first, second, and third-year stands of M. × giganteus. Three M. × giganteus fields were planted with eight plots, one field each in 2009, 2010, and 2011. To quantify autumnal leaf senescence of plants within each stand age, photosynthetic and leaf [N] measurements were made twice weekly from early September until a killing frost. Following chilling events (daily temperature averages below 10 °C), photosynthetic rates in first year plants rebounded to a greater degree than those in second- and third-year plants. By the end of the growing season, first-year M. × giganteus had A and ΦPSII rates up to 4 times greater than third-year M. × giganteus, while leaf [N] was up to 2.4 times greater. The increased photosynthetic capability and leaf N status in first-year M. × giganteus suggests that the photosynthetic apparatus was not dismantled before a killing frost, thus potentially limiting nutrient translocation, and may explain why young M. × giganteus stands do not survive winter when older stands do. Because previous senescence research has primarily focused on annual or woody species, our results suggest that M. × giganteus may be an interesting herbaceous perennial system to investigate the interactive effects of plant ageing and nutrient status on senescence and may highlight management strategies that could potentially increase winter survival rates in first-year stands.
Highlights
Interest in bioenergy derived from dedicated perennial crops has grown substantially in the past decade
Poor first winter survival in Miscanthus × giganteus has been anecdotally attributed to incomplete first autumn senescence, but these assessments never paired first-year with older M. × giganteus in side-by-side trials to separate the effect of weather from stand age
Regression analysis showed that the relationship of gs and A was slightly different in first and second-year plants in 2010 (P
Summary
Interest in bioenergy derived from dedicated perennial crops has grown substantially in the past decade. × giganteus has many other characteristics which increase its popularity as a biomass crop (Heaton et al, 2004; Somerville et al, 2010). Among these is C4 photosynthesis, which can be up to 40% more. × giganteus is very efficient at maintaining photosynthesis and high productivity at low temperatures (Beale and Long, 1995; Wang et al, 2008; Long and Spence, 2013). The ‘Illinois’ clone, widely used in US trials, seems to tolerate chilling temperatures even better than closely related genotypes, enabling continued leaf extension in young plants moved from 25 °C to 10 °C (Glowacka et al, 2014a)
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have