Autoregulatory Management in Traumatic Brain Injury: The Role of Absolute Pressure Reactivity Index Values and Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Curve Shape.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate if the absolute pressure reactivity index (PRx) value influenced the association between cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and outcome and if the optimal CPP (CPPopt) curve shape influenced the association between deviation from CPPopt and outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI). We included 383 TBI patients treated at the neurointensive care in Uppsala between 2008 and 2018 with at least 24 h of CPP data. To determine the influence of absolute PRx values on the association between absolute CPP and outcome, the percentage of monitoring time for combinations of CPP and PRx were correlated with outcome (Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS-E]) in a heatmap. To determine the association between CPP and the relatively best PRx (CPPopt), the percentage of monitoring time of ΔCPPopt (actual CPP-CPPopt) ±5 mm Hg was analyzed in relation to GOS-E. To determine the association between CPP and the relatively best PRx within a certain absolute PRx range (curve shape), both the percentage of ΔCPPopt within the absolute limits of reactivity (PRx <0.00, < 0.15, etc.) and within certain confidence intervals of PRx-deterioration (+0.025, +0.05 etc.) from CPPopt were analyzed in relation to GOS-E. The heatmap of PRx and absolute CPP versus outcome indicated that the CPP range (55-75 mm Hg) associated with favorable outcome was wider when PRx was below 0, whereas the upper CPP-threshold decreased as PRx increased. CPPopt could be calculated during 53% of the monitoring time. Higher percentage of monitoring time with ΔCPPopt ±5 mm Hg, ΔCPPopt within the reactivity-thresholds (PRx <0.30), and ΔCPPopt within the PRx-confidence interval +0.025 were all independently associated with favorable outcome in separate logistic regressions. These regressions had similar area under receiver operating curve and were not superior to a similar regression when the CPPopt-target was replaced by the percentage of monitoring time within the traditional fixed CPP-targets 60 to 70 mm Hg. Individualized CPPopt-targets exhibited a comparable outcome association as traditional CPP targets and different definitions of the best CPPopt range based on the PRx value had a limited effect on the association between deviation from CPPopt and outcome. Since CPPopt could only be calculated during half of the time, an alternative approach would be to assess the absolute PRx to anticipate a safe CPP range.