Abstract

Robots are widely expected—and pushed—to transform open-field agriculture, but these visions remain wedded to optimizing monocultural farming systems. Meanwhile there is little pull for automation from ecology-based, diversified farming realms. Noting this gap, we here explore the potential for robots to foster an agroecological approach to crop production. The research was situated in The Netherlands within the case of pixel cropping, a nascent farming method in which multiple food and service crops are planted together in diverse assemblages employing agroecological practices such as intercropping and biological pest control. Around this case we engaged with a variety of specialists in discussion groups, workshops, and design challenges to explore the potential of field robots to meet the multifaceted demands of highly diverse agroecological cropping systems. This generated a spectrum of imaginations for how automated tools might—or might not—be appropriately used, ranging from fully automated visions, to collaborative scenarios, to fully analogue prototypes. We found that automating agroecological cropping systems requires finding ways to imbue the ethos of agroecology into designed tools, thereby seeking to overcome tensions between production aims and other forms of social and ecological care. We conclude that a rethinking of automation is necessary for agroecological contexts: not as a blueprint for replacing humans, but making room for analogue and hybrid forms of agricultural work. These findings highlight a need for design processes which include a diversity of actors, involve iterative design cycles, and incorporate feedback between designers, practitioners, tools, and cropping systems.

Highlights

  • A drive towards automation of both physical and cognitive work processes fuels increasingly ubiquitous applications of robots,1 for example in manufacturing, mobility, entertainment, health care, security, and food processing

  • Our inquiry began by seeking to position the specific question of automating pixel cropping within the broader framing of diversified agriculture via agroecology, asking a group of agroecology-focused farming systems researchers to define agroecology

  • One participant explained, farming agroecologically means using a localized approach in which you start with “what the ecosystem offers” and seek to “understand the function of each inhabitant of the ecosystem” and design farming interventions based on nature’s “template,” rather than the other way around. Another participant, who was from Southeast Asia, described expressions of agroecology in her community as being linked to a religious edict prohibiting the harm of nature

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A drive towards automation of both physical and cognitive work processes fuels increasingly ubiquitous applications of robots, for example in manufacturing, mobility, entertainment, health care, security, and food processing. Reading popular media coverage of advances in open-field agricultural automation gives a particular view of the way crop husbandry is being conceived, revealing the dominant monocultural approach—cultivating a sole crop in a given area— underpinning these developments. Recent headlines like those in The Guardian announce a particular direction for automation: “The rise of the robot farmer: We’ll have space bots with lasers, killing plants” (Harris, 2018); or the latest, “Killer farm robot dispatches weeds with electric bolts” (Carrington, 2021). The dualisms evident in these titles (crop/weed, nature/(agri)culture) assume a particular approach to farming that is both precipitated and perpetuated by narrowly delimited measures of success

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call