Abstract
Human adults are faster to respond to small/large numerals with their left/right hand when they judge the parity of numerals, which is known as the SNARC (spatial-numerical association of response codes) effect. It has been proposed that the size of the SNARC effect depends on response latencies. The current study introduced a perceptual orientation task, where participants were asked to judge the orientation of a digit or a frame surrounding the digit. The present study first confirmed the SNARC effect with native Chinese speakers (Experiment 1) using a parity task, and then examined whether the emergence and size of the SNARC effect depended on the response latencies (Experiments 2, 3, and 4) using a perceptual orientation judgment task. Our results suggested that (a) the automatic processing of response-related numerical-spatial information occurred with Chinese-speaking participants in the parity task; (b) the SNARC effect was also found when the task did not require semantic access; and (c) the size of the effect depended on the processing speed of the task-relevant dimension. Finally, we proposed an underlying mechanism to explain the SNARC effect in the perceptual orientation judgment task.
Highlights
Research on numerical cognition has made considerable progress over the past decades [1,2,3]
This finding was consistent with previous research with Chinese-speaking participants [24, 25]
The objective of Experiment 2 was to compare the size of the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect at different levels of difficulty in a perceptual orientation judgment task
Summary
Research on numerical cognition has made considerable progress over the past decades [1,2,3]. Dehaene and his colleagues [4, 5] asked participants to judge the parity of the digits 0 to 9 by pressing left or right buttons, and found that
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have