Abstract

Age estimation from radiologic data is an important topic both in clinical medicine as well as in forensic applications, where it is used to assess unknown chronological age or to discriminate minors from adults. In this paper, we propose an automatic multi-factorial age estimation method based on MRI data of hand, clavicle, and teeth to extend the maximal age range from up to 19 years, as commonly used for age assessment based on hand bones, to up to 25 years, when combined with clavicle bones and wisdom teeth. Fusing age-relevant information from all three anatomical sites, our method utilizes a deep convolutional neural network that is trained on a dataset of 322 subjects in the age range between 13 and 25 years, to achieve a mean absolute prediction error in regressing chronological age of 1.01±0.74 years. Furthermore, when used for majority age classification, we show that a classifier derived from thresholding our regression-based predictor is better suited than a classifier directly trained with a classification loss, especially when taking into account that those cases of minors being wrongly classified as adults need to be minimized. In conclusion, we overcome the limitations of the multi-factorial methods currently used in forensic practice, i.e., dependence on ionizing radiation, subjectivity in quantifying age-relevant information, and lack of an established approach to fuse this information from individual anatomical sites.

Highlights

  • A GE estimation of living individuals or human remains is a very active research field in legal medicine and forensic anthropology [1] as well as in clinical medicine [2]

  • We extensively studied a deep learning based multi-factorial age estimation method from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of 322 subjects from a large, forensically relevant age range between 13 and 25 years, which automatically fuses information from hand bones, clavicle bones, and wisdom teeth

  • We presented for the first time such an approach that overcomes several limitations of the method currently used in forensic practice, i.e., the use of ionizing radiation, the subjectivity due to assigning discrete staging schemes for the individual anatomical sites, and the lack of consensus in how information from individual sites should be fused into a final age estimate

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A GE estimation of living individuals or human remains is a very active research field in legal medicine and forensic anthropology [1] as well as in clinical medicine [2]. While clinical interest is largest in children close to puberty, e.g., to Manuscript received March 30, 2018; revised July 23, 2018; accepted September 3, 2018. Date of publication August 29, 2018; date of current version July 1, 2019.

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call