Abstract

.Purpose: Automating fiducial detection and localization in the patient’s pre-operative images can lead to better registration accuracy, reduced human errors, and shorter intervention time. Most current approaches are optimized for a single marker type, mainly spherical adhesive markers. A fully automated algorithm is proposed and evaluated for screw and spherical titanium fiducials, typically used in high-accurate frameless surgical navigation.Approach: The algorithm builds on previous approaches with morphological functions and pose estimation algorithms. A 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) is proposed for the fiducial classification task and evaluated for both traditional closed-set and emerging open-set classifiers. A proposed digital ground-truth experiment, with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging software, is performed to determine the localization accuracy of the algorithm. The localized fiducial positions in the CBCT images by the presented algorithm were compared to the actual known positions in the virtual phantom models. The difference represents the fiducial localization error (FLE).Results: A total of 241 screws, 151 spherical fiducials, and 1550 other structures are identified with the best true positive rate 95.9% for screw and 99.3% for spherical fiducials at 8.7% and 3.4% false positive rate, respectively. The best achieved FLE mean and its standard deviation for a screw and spherical marker are 58 (14) and , respectively.Conclusions: Accurate marker detection and localization were achieved, with spherical fiducials being superior to screws. Large marker volume and smaller voxel size yield significantly smaller FLEs. Attenuating noise by mesh smoothing has a minor effect on FLE. Future work will focus on expanding the CNN for image segmentation.

Highlights

  • Fiducial markers are used for reliable and accurate patient registration in image-guided interventions

  • The square root of the mean of this squared distance is often referred to as fiducial registration error (FRE)

  • It has been shown that both the FRE and the target registration error (TRE) are dependent on the error in identifying the correct location of the fiducials, called fiducial localization error (FLE).[7,8]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fiducial markers are used for reliable and accurate patient registration in image-guided interventions. Accuracy for the surgeries of the lateral skull base.[4] Following the placement of fiducial markers and recording the patient’s pre-operative images, rigid registration is used to establish medical navigation by computing the optimal transformation between the fiducial points in the image and in the physical location of that patient during surgery. A more reasonable measure of the registration error is at the (surgical) point of interest referred to as target registration error (TRE).[6] It has been shown that both the FRE and the TRE are dependent on the error in identifying the correct location of the fiducials, called fiducial localization error (FLE).[7,8] The

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call