Abstract
Toolmarks examination validity and subjectivity have come under scrutiny. This research focuses on the case of cutting plier marks. This paper presents an automatic comparison method and assesses its performance. It is designed to assign a weight to the forensic evidence (i.e, a comparison between toolmarks) with a likelihood ratio (LR). 3D topographies are acquired and treated to be compared using a set of correlation metrics. A machine learning algorithm combines comparison metrics and enables LR computation. Pliers of various brands and models were used to study the variability both within and between tools. We explained why the specific zone (area along the blade) has to be chosen to build the within-source variability and how the between-source variability can be built in different scenarios. Misleading evidence rates between 0 % and 4 % have been measured and it demonstrates the accuracy of the method when applied on the pliers used.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
