Abstract

ABSTRACT The idea of anonymity is central to how folk music is defined in Turkey. A widely circulating theory posits that folk songs are not simply anonymous because their authors are forgotten, but because folkloric creativity differs from the process of artistic creativity in other genres. This article draws on the concept of semiotic ideology to analyse the assumptions that mediate how subscribers to the anonymity theory hear folk music. The anonymity theory resonates with recent scholarly accounts of collaborative or distributed creativity, though the network of agency it maps is distinct. Other scholars have described a semiotic ideology associated with romanticism whereby the materiality of semiotic forms is constitutive or reflective of the interiority of an individual creator’s self. The anonymity theory, meanwhile, takes the materiality of semiotic forms to reflect a collective self’s interiority, and it locates creative agency beyond the individuals most involved in folk songs’ production.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.