Author response: Improved isolation of extracellular vesicles by removal of both free proteins and lipoproteins

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are currently of tremendous interest in many research disciplines and EVs have potential for development of EV diagnostics or therapeutics. Most well-known single EV isolation methods have their particular advantages and disadvantages in terms of EV purity and EV yield. Combining EV isolation methods provides additional potential to improve the efficacy of both purity and yield.This review assesses the contribution and efficacy of using combined EV isolation methods by performing a two-step systematic literature analysis from all papers applying EV isolation in the year 2019. This resulted in an overview of the various methods being applied for EV isolations. A second database was generated for all studies within the first database that fairly compared multiple EV isolation methods by determining both EV purity and EV yield after isolation.From these databases it is shown that the most used EV isolation methods are not per definition the best methods based on EV purity or EV yield, indicating that more factors play a role in the choice which EV isolation method to choose than only the efficacy of the method. From the included studies it is shown that ~60% of all the included EV isolations were performed with combined EV isolation methods. The majority of EV isolations were performed with differential ultracentrifugation alone or in combination with differential ultrafiltration. When efficacy of EV isolation methods was determined in terms of EV purity and EV yield, combined EV isolation methods clearly outperformed single EV isolation methods, regardless of the type of starting material used. A recommended starting point would be the use of size-exclusion chromatography since this method, especially when combined with low-speed centrifugation, resulted in the highest EV purity, while still providing a reasonable EV yield.

BackgroundUrinary extracellular vesicles (EVs) are a source of biomarkers with broad potential applications across clinical research, including monitoring radiation exposure. A key limitation to their implementation is minimal standardization in EV isolation and analytical methods. Further, most urinary EV isolation protocols necessitate large volumes of sample. This study aimed to compare and optimize isolation and analytical methods for EVs from small volumes of urine.Methods3 EV isolation methods were compared: ultracentrifugation, magnetic bead-based, and size-exclusion chromatography from 0.5 mL or 1 mL of rat and human urine. EV yield and mass spectrometry signals (Q-ToF and Triple Quad) were evaluated from each method. Metabolomic profiling was performed on EVs isolated from the urine of rats exposed to ionizing radiation 1-, 14-, 30- or 90-days post-exposure, and human urine from patients receiving thoracic radiotherapy for the treatment of lung cancer pre- and post-treatment.ResultsSize-exclusion chromatography is the preferred method for EV isolation from 0.5 mL of urine. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomic analyses of EV cargo identified biochemical changes induced by radiation, including altered nucleotide, folate, and lipid metabolism. We have provided standard operating procedures for implementation of these methods in other laboratories.ConclusionsWe demonstrate that EVs can be isolated from small volumes of urine and analytically investigated for their biochemical contents to detect radiation induced metabolomic changes. These findings lay a groundwork for future development of methods to monitor response to radiotherapy and can be extended to an array of molecular phenotyping studies aimed at characterizing EV cargo.

Extracellular vesicles (EV) are enriched with proteins and RNA cargo, promoting cell-to-cell communication. Biofluid derived EV cargo is used for discovering disease specific markers for diagnosis and disease monitoring. Blood is a complex fluid with an abundance of protiens and thus isolation of EVs is challenging. Therefore, methods for EV isolation, including commercial kits use thromboplastin D (TP-D) for pretreatment of plasma to increase EV purity and yield. This pretreatment can introduce contaminants. We performed a comparative study to evaluate the effect ofEV isolation methods focusing on (a) pretreatment of plasma with additives, which include: rabbit TP (rTP) versus human recombinant thromboplastin (huTP), to increase purity and yield (b) an additional centrifugation step prior to freezing plasma and (c) comparison of frozen versus fresh plasma EV isolations. Pretreatment with rTP generated a dynamic range of proteins, however, most of these proteins were contaminants, introduced from the rTP (99.1% purity). As an alternative, huTP was used, which did not introduce any significant contaminants, however, this did not increase yield or purity. Additionally, an extra 10,000g centrifugation did not improve either EV yield or purity. Finally, comparison of fresh or frozen plasma showed no significant difference, an important factor when sourcing plasma from biobanks. Appropriate controlsare required when adding any additives during EV isolationas even a small percentage of contaminants can have a major effect on results. Furthermore, biobanked plasma can be used with no major changes to processing.

Cellular crosstalk between hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells and the bone marrow (BM) niche is vital for the development and maintenance of myeloid malignancies. These compartments can communicate via bidirectional transfer of extracellular vesicles (EVs). EV trafficking in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) plays a crucial role in shaping the BM microenvironment into a leukemia-permissive niche. Although several EV isolation methods have been developed, it remains a major challenge to define the most accurate and reliable procedure. Here, we tested the efficacy and functional assay compatibility of four different EV isolation methods in leukemia-derived EVs: (1) membrane affinity-based: exoEasy Kit alone and (2) in combination with Amicon filtration; (3) precipitation: ExoQuick-TC; and (4) ultracentrifugation (UC). Western blot analysis of EV fractions showed the highest enrichment of EV marker expression (e.g., CD63, HSP70, and TSG101) by precipitation with removal of overabundant soluble proteins [e.g., bovine serum albumin (BSA)], which were not discarded using UC. Besides the presence of damaged EVs after UC, intact EVs were successfully isolated with all methods as evidenced by highly maintained spherical- and cup-shaped vesicles in transmission electron microscopy. Nanoparticle tracking analysis of EV particle size and concentration revealed significant differences in EV isolation efficacy, with exoEasy Kit providing the highest EV yield recovery. Of note, functional assays with exoEasy Kit-isolated EVs showed significant toxicity towards treated target cells [e.g., mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs)], which was abrogated when combining exoEasy Kit with Amicon filtration. Additionally, MSC treated with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged exoEasy Kit-isolated EVs did not show any EV uptake, while EV isolation by precipitation demonstrated efficient EV internalization. Taken together, the choice of EV isolation procedure significantly impacts the yield and potential functionality of leukemia-derived EVs. The cheapest method (UC) resulted in contaminated and destructed EV fractions, while the isolation method with the highest EV yield (exoEasy Kit) appeared to be incompatible with functional assays. We identified two methods (precipitation-based ExoQuick-TC and membrane affinity-based exoEasy Kit combined with Amicon filtration) yielding pure and intact EVs, also suitable for application in functional assays. This study highlights the importance of selecting the right EV isolation method depending on the desired experimental design.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are a versatile group of cell-secreted membranous nanoparticles present in body fluids. They have an exceptional diagnostic potential due to their molecular content matching the originating cells and accessibility from body fluids. However, methods for EV isolation are still in development, with size exclusion chromatography (SEC) emerging as a preferred method. Here we compared four types of SEC to isolate EVs from the CSF of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. A pool of nine CSF samples was separated by SEC columns packed with Sepharose CL-6B, Sephacryl S-400 or Superose 6PG and a ready-to-use qEV10/70 nm column. A total of 46 fractions were collected and analysed by slot-blot followed by Ponceau staining. Immunodetection was performed for albumin, EV markers CD9, CD81, and lipoprotein markers ApoE and ApoAI. The size and concentration of nanoparticles in fractions were determined by tunable resistive pulse sensing and EVs were visualised by transmission electron microscopy. We show that all four SEC techniques enabled separation of CSF into nanoparticle- and free protein-enriched fractions. Sepharose CL-6B resulted in a significantly higher number of separated EVs while lipoproteins were eluted together with free proteins. Our data indicate that Sepharose CL-6B is suitable for isolation of EVs from CSF and their separation from lipoproteins.

The miRNA cargo of plasma extracellular vesicles (EVs) is commonly studied for its biomarker potential. However, isolation of EVs from human plasma is challenging. Although size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) is commonly used to isolate plasma EVs, SEC does not completely separate EVs from other miRNA carriers such as cells, lipoproteins, and proteins. Recently, new SEC columns were introduced, but hitherto, no systematic study was performed to compare the recovery and purity of plasma EVs using both traditional and new columns. In this study, we investigated the recovery of EVs and separation efficacy from lipoproteins and proteins using different SEC columns, and how recovery and separation affect miRNA cargo analysis. EVs were isolated from pooled (n = 5) platelet-depleted plasma using 10 different SEC columns. For each column, three EV-enriched fractions were pooled and concentrations of EVs, lipoproteins, proteins, and miRNAs were measured by flow cytometry, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), Bradford assay, and qRT-PCR, respectively. Our results show that the resin pore size affects all measured parameters: a small pore size increases recovery of EVs and quantity of miRNA, but decreases the separation efficacy compared to a large pore size. Regression analysis showed that the investigated miRNAs are more strongly associated with EVs than with lipoproteins or proteins. The choice of a SEC column markedly affects the recovery, separation efficacy, and miRNA cargo analysis of human plasma-derived EVs. We recommend either using SEC columns with a 70-nm pore size due to their superior EV purity or studying the effect of non-EV particles on the miRNAs of interest.

The physiological and pathophysiological roles of extracellular vesicles (EVs) have become increasingly recognized, making the EV field a quickly evolving area of research. There are many different methods for EV isolation, each with distinct advantages and disadvantages that affect the downstream yield and purity of EVs. Thus, characterizing the EV prep isolated from a given source by a chosen method is important for interpretation of downstream results and comparison of results across laboratories. Various methods exist for determining the size and quantity of EVs, which can be altered by disease states or in response to external conditions. Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) is one of the prominent technologies used for high-throughput analysis of individual EVs. Here, we present a detailed protocol for quantification and size determination of EVs isolated from mouse perigonadal adipose tissue and human plasma using a breakthrough technology for NTA representing major advances in the field. The results demonstrate that this method can deliver reproducible and valid total particle concentration and size distribution data for EVs isolated from different sources using different methods, as confirmed by transmission electron microscopy. The adaptation of this instrument for NTA will address the need for standardization in NTA methods to increase rigor and reproducibility in EV research.

Background/Aims: Extracellular vesicles (EVs), including microvesicles and exosomes, deliver bioactive cargo mediating intercellular communication in physiological and pathological conditions. EVs are increasingly investigated as therapeutic agents and targets, but also as disease biomarkers. However, a definite consensus regarding EV isolation methods is lacking, which makes it intricate to standardize research practices and eventually reach a desirable level of data comparability. In our study, we performed an inter-laboratory comparison of EV isolation based on a differential ultracentrifugation protocol carried out in 4 laboratories in 2 independent rounds of isolation. Methods: Conditioned medium of colorectal cancer cells was prepared and pooled by 1 person and distributed to each of the participating laboratories for isolation according to a pre-defined protocol. After EV isolation in each laboratory, quantification and characterization of isolated EVs was collectively done by 1 person having the highest expertise in the respective test method: Western blot, flow cytometry (fluorescence-activated cell sorting [FACS], nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Results: EVs were visualized with TEM, presenting similar cup-shaped and spherical morphology and sizes ranging from 30 to 150 nm. NTA results showed similar size ranges of particles in both isolation rounds. EV preparations showed high purity by the expression of EV marker proteins CD9, CD63, CD81, Alix, and TSG101, and the lack of calnexin. FACS analysis of EVs revealed intense staining for CD63 and CD81 but lower levels for CD9 and TSG101. Preparations from 1 laboratory presented significantly lower particle numbers (p < 0.0001), most probably related to increased processing time. However, even when standardizing processing time, particle yields still differed significantly between groups, indicating inter-laboratory differences in the efficiency of EV isolation. Importantly, no relation was observed between centrifugation speed/k-factor and EV yield. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that quantitative differences in EV yield might be due to equipment- and operator-dependent technical variability in ultracentrifugation-based EV isolation. Furthermore, our study emphasizes the need to standardize technical parameters such as the exact run speed and k-factor in order to transfer protocols between different laboratories. This hints at substantial inter-laboratory biases that should be assessed in multi-centric studies.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanosized vesicles released by almost all cells. Interest in EVs has increased dramatically in recent years. Although several aspects of these vesicles such as composition, origin, purpose and potential uses have already been well evaluated, many possible avenues of research remain open. One aspect yet to be fully understood is the nucleic acids contained within EVs. In this dissertation, we endeavoured to expand the current knowledge surrounding EV-DNA and EV-RNA by evaluating their potential diagnostic abilities in cancer models. As EVs can be isolated from body fluids and reflect their cell of origin, they are great candidates for liquid biopsies. Here, the ability to detect SMARCB1 mutations in EV-DNA of AT/RT cell lines and mouse plasma samples was investigated. Additionally, the ability to detect a FLI1 translocation in EV-RNA of a Ewing sarcoma cell line was demonstrated. Furthermore, EVs have important roles in cellular communication as well as tumour development and metastasis. Therefore, in the next step, the transfer of EV-DNA to recipient cells was investigated by establishing an EdU labelling method which allowed for the visualisation of EV-DNA with confocal microscopy. Here, the transfer and internalisation of EV-DNA by recipient cells was demonstrated. Additionally, the co-localisation of EV-DNA with donor cell components like Rab5+- and Rab7+ endosomes as well as transfer of donor EV-DNA to the recipient cell nucleus were observed. In parallel to the aforementioned projects, the evaluation of an EV isolation method that combined two previously published methods of PEG precipitation and SEC was carried out, with hope of optimising a method that would circumvent the need for ultracentrifugation of our starting materials. Since the emergence of disadvantages of UC, several EV isolation methods have been developed - all with their own advantages and disadvantages. Here, EVs isolated by the PEG/SEC method were compared to EVs isolated using UC alone, and analysed for characteristics such as EV yield and nucleic acid content. The work presented in this doctoral thesis has set the foundation for future research projects based in these areas and contributes to better understanding of EVs and their nucleic acid cargo.

Plant extracellular vesicles (EVs) play critical roles in the cross-kingdom trafficking of molecules from hosts to interacting microbes, most notably in plant defense responses. However, the isolation of pure, intact EVs from plants remains challenging. A variety of methods have been utilized to isolate plant EVs from apoplastic washing fluid (AWF). Here, we compare published plant EV isolation methods, and provide our recommended method for the isolation and purification of plant EVs. This method includes a detailed protocol for clean AWF collection from Arabidopsis thaliana leaves, followed by EV isolation via differential centrifugation. To further separate and purify specific subclasses of EVs from heterogeneous vesicle populations, density gradient ultracentrifugation and immunoaffinity capture are then utilized. We found that immunoaffinity capture is the most precise method for specific EV subclass isolation when suitable specific EV biomarkers and their corresponding antibodies are available. Overall, this study provides a guide for the selection and optimization of EV isolation methods for desired downstream applications.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are cell membrane-derived phospholipid bilayer nanostructures that contain bioactive proteins, enzymes, lipids and polymers of nucleotides. They play a role in intercellular communication and are present in body fluids. EVs can be isolated by methods like ultracentrifugation (UC), polyethylene-glycol-precipitation (PEG) or size exclusion chromatography (SEC). The co-presence of immunoglobulins (Ig) in EV samples isolated from plasma (pEVs) is often reported and this may influence the assessment of the biological function and phenotype of EVs in bio- and immunoassay. Here, we studied the presence of an Ig-based therapeutic (etanercept) in pEV samples isolated from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and improved the isolation method to obtain purer pEVs. From plasma of etanercept (Tumor-necrosis-factor (TNF)-α antibodies)-treated RA patients pEVs were isolated by either UC, PEG or SEC. SEC isolated pEVs showed the highest particle-to-protein ratio. Strong TNF-α inhibition determined in a TNF-α sensitive reporter assay was observed by pEVs isolated by UC and PEG, and to a lesser extent by SEC, suggesting the presence of functional etanercept. SEC isolation of etanercept or labelled immunoglobulin G (IgG) showed co-isolation of these antibodies in the pEV fraction in the presence of plasma or a high protein (albumin) concentration. To minimize the presence of etanercept or immunoglobulins, we extended SEC (eSEC) column length from 56mm to 222mm (total stacking volume unchanged). No effect on the amount of isolated pEVs was observed while protein and IgG content were markedly reduced (90%). Next, from six etanercept- treated RA patients, pEVs were isolated on a eSEC or standard SEC column, in parallel. TNF-α inhibition was again observed in pEVs isolated by conventional SEC but not by eSEC. To confirm the purer pEVs isolated by eSEC the basal IL-8 promoter activation in human monocytes was determined and in 4 out of 5 SEC isolated pEVs activation was observed while eSEC isolated pEVs did not. This study shows that extended SEC columns yielded pEVs without detectable biologicals and with low protein and IgG levels. This isolation method will improve the characterization of pEVs as potential biomarkers and mediators of disease.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are reminiscent of their cell of origin and thus represent a valuable source of biomarkers. However, for EVs to be used as biomarkers in clinical practice, simple, comparable, and reproducible analytical methods must be applied. Although progress is being made in EV separation methods for human biofluids, the implementation of EV assays for clinical diagnosis and common guidelines are still lacking. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of established EV separation techniques from human serum and plasma, including ultracentrifugation and size exclusion chromatography (SEC), followed by concentration using (a) ultracentrifugation, (b) ultrafiltration, or (c) precipitation, and immunoaffinity isolation. We analyzed the size, number, protein, and miRNA content of the obtained EVs and assessed the functional delivery of EV cargo. Our results demonstrate that all methods led to an adequate yield of small EVs. While no significant difference in miRNA content was observed for the different separation methods, ultracentrifugation was best for subsequent flow cytometry analysis. Immunoaffinity isolation is not suitable for subsequent protein analyses. SEC + ultracentrifugation showed the best functional delivery of EV cargo. In summary, combining SEC with ultracentrifugation gives the highest yield of pure and functional EVs and allows reliable analysis of both protein and miRNA contents. We propose this combination as the preferred EV isolation method for biomarker studies from human serum or plasma.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been identified in the uterine fluid in different species and have been pointed as key players in the embryo-maternal dialogue, maternal recognition of pregnancy and establishment of pregnancy. However, little is known about the uterine EVs in the mare. Therefore, the present study aimed at characterizing EVs from uterine lavage of cyclic mares by comparing five EVs isolation methods and the combination of them: (1) ultracentrifugation (UC); (2) concentration of lavage volume by Centricon ultrafiltration (CE); (3) the use of CE with different washing steps (phosphate-buffered saline with or without trehalose); (4) size-exclusion chromatography with iZON-qEV columns, and (5) a combination of the methods with best results based on EVs yield, purity, and protein cargo profiles. Transmission electron microscopy and Western blotting confirmed the isolation of EVs by all methods but with quantitative and qualitative differences. Mass spectrometry provided differences in protein profiles between methods, number of identified proteins, and protein classes. Our results indicate that the combination of CE/trehalose/iZON/UC is an optimal method to isolate equine uterine EVs with good yield and purity that can be applied in future studies to determine the role of equine uterine EVs in embryo-maternal interactions.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) can be isolated and purified from cell cultures and biofluids using different methodologies. Here, we explored a novel EV isolation approach by combining superabsorbent polymers (SAP) in a dialysis membrane with size exclusion chromatography (SEC) to achieve high concentration and purity of EVs without the use of ultracentrifugation (UC). Suspension HEK293 cells transfected with CD63 coupled with Thermo Luciferase were used to quantify the EV yield and purity. The 500mL conditioned medium volume was initially reduced by pressure ultrafiltration, followed by UC, SAP or a centrifugal filter unit (CFU). Using either of these methods, the EVs were concentrated to a final volume of approximately 1mL, with retained functionality. The yield, quantified by luciferase activity, was highest with UC (70%-80%), followed by SAP (60%-70%) and CFU (50%-60%). Further purification of the EVs was performed by iodixanol density cushion (IDC) or SEC (Sepharose CL-2B or 6B, in either 10 or 20mL columns). Although the IDC and Sepharose CL-2B (10mL) achieved the highest yields, the purity was slightly higher (30%) with IDC. In conclusion, combining SAP concentration with CL-2B SEC is an alternative and efficient way to isolate EVs without using UC.

The development of an extracellular vesicles (EV)-based therapeutic product requires the implementation of reproducible and scalable, purification protocols for clinical-grade EV. Commonly used isolation methods including ultracentrifugation, density gradient centrifugation, size exclusion chromatography, and polymer-based precipitation, faced limitations such as yield efficiency, EV purity, and sample volume. We developed a GMP-compatible method for the scalable production, concentration, and isolation of EV through a strategy involving, tangential flow filtration (TFF). We applied this purification method for the isolation of EV from conditioned medium (CM) of cardiac stromal cells, namely cardiac progenitor cells (CPC) which has been shown to possess potential therapeutical application in heart failure. Conditioned medium collection and EV isolation using TFF demonstrated consistent particle recovery (~1013 particle/mL) enrichment of small/medium-EV subfraction (range size 120-140nm). EV preparations achieved a 97% reduction of major protein-complex contaminant and showed unaltered biological activity. The protocol describes methods to assess EV identity and purity as well as procedures to perform downstream applications including functional potency assay and quality control tests. The large-scale manufacturing of GMP-grade EV represents a versatile protocol that can be easily applied to different cell sources for wide range of therapeutic areas.