Auditory-Perceptual and Pupillometric Evaluation of Vocal Roughness and Listening Effort in Tracheoesophageal Speech

Abstract

This study evaluated auditory-perceptual judgments of perceived vocal roughness (VR) and listening effort (LE) along with pupillometric responses in response to speech samples produced by tracheoesophageal (TE) talkers. Twenty normal-hearing, naive young adults (eight menand twelve women) served as listeners. Listeners were divided into two groups: (1) a with-anchor (WA) group (four menand six women) and (2) a no-anchor (NA) group (four menand six women). All were presented with speech samples produced by twenty TE talkers; listeners evaluated two auditory-perceptual dimensions-VR and LE-using visual analog scales. Anchors were provided to the WA group as an external referent for their ratings. In addition, during the auditory-perceptual task, each listener's pupil reactions also were recorded with peak pupil dilation (PPD) measures extracted as a physiologic indicator associated with the listening task. High interrater reliability was obtained for both the WA and NA groups. High correlations also were observed between auditory-perceptual ratings of roughness and LE, and between PPD values and ratings of both dimensions for the WA group. The inclusion of an anchor during the auditory-perceptual task improved interrater reliability ratings, but it also imposed an increased demand on listeners. Data obtained offer insights into the relationship between subjective indices of voice quality (ie, auditory-perceptual evaluation) and physiologic responses (PPD) to the abnormal voice quality that characterizes TE talkers. Furthermore, these data provide information on the inclusion/exclusion of audio anchors and potential increases in listener demand in response to abnormal voice quality.