Abstract

Combining signals across the senses improves precision and speed of perception, although this multisensory benefit declines for asynchronous signals. Multisensory events may produce synchronized stimuli at source but asynchronies inevitably arise due to distance, intensity, attention and neural latencies. Temporal recalibration is an adaptive phenomenon that serves to perceptually realign physically asynchronous signals. Recently, it was discovered that temporal recalibration occurs far more rapidly than previously thought and does not require minutes of adaptation. Using a classical audiovisual simultaneity task and a series of brief flashes and tones varying in onset asynchrony, perceived simultaneity on a given trial was found to shift in the direction of the preceding trial’s asynchrony. Here we examine whether this inter-trial recalibration reflects the same process as prolonged adaptation by combining both paradigms: participants adapted to a fixed temporal lag for several minutes followed by a rapid series of test trials requiring a synchrony judgment. Interestingly, we find evidence of recalibration from prolonged adaptation and inter-trial recalibration within a single experiment. We show a dissociation in which sustained adaptation produces a large but decaying recalibration effect whilst inter-trial recalibration produces large transient effects whose sign matches that of the previous trial.

Highlights

  • Combining signals across the senses improves precision and speed of perception, this multisensory benefit declines for asynchronous signals

  • We observed a strong inter-trial recalibration effect as the point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) was significantly shorter (9 ms) when audition led on the preceding trial than when vision led on the preceding trial (23 ms), F(1, 9) = 12.9, p = . 006

  • The interaction between modality order on trial t-1 and time since adaptation offset was far from significant, F(47, 423) = .8, p = . 538, indicating that the inter-trial recalibration effect remained constant over the test phase of the experiment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Combining signals across the senses improves precision and speed of perception, this multisensory benefit declines for asynchronous signals. Multisensory benefits are optimal when the unimodal signals are perceived simultaneously and decline with increasing asynchrony[9,10,11] This presents a challenge because in natural scenes, audiovisual signals may originate from a single source, they are likely to activate the brain’s unisensory cortices asynchronously due to different propagation speeds for sound and light as well as different neural transduction and latency times. Of the modality leading on the preceding trial This indicates that temporal recalibration occurs far more rapidly than previously thought and may only require exposure to a single, brief asynchrony. To examine this we used a standard prolonged period of asynchronous audiovisual adaptation (3 mins, see adaptation phase, Fig. 1) followed by a sequence of 98 audiovisual test trials of variable positive and negative SOAs, each requiring a synchrony judgment (‘synchronous’ or not, see test phase, Fig. 1)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call