Abstract
The amygdala is believed to play a major role in orienting attention towards threat-related stimuli. However, behavioral studies on amygdala-damaged patients have given inconsistent results—variously reporting decreased, persisted, and increased attention towards threat. Here we aimed to characterize the impact of developmental amygdala damage on emotion perception and the nature and time-course of spatial attentional bias towards fearful faces. We investigated SF, a 14-year-old with selective bilateral amygdala damage due to Urbach–Wiethe disease (UWD), and ten healthy controls. Participants completed a fear sensitivity questionnaire, facial expression classification task, and dot-probe task with fearful or neutral faces for spatial cueing. Three cue durations were used to assess the time-course of attentional bias. SF expressed significantly lower fear sensitivity, and showed a selective impairment in classifying fearful facial expressions. Despite this impairment in fear recognition, very brief (100 msec) fearful cues could orient SF's spatial attention. In healthy controls, the attentional bias emerged later and persisted longer. SF's attentional bias was due solely to facilitated engagement to fear, while controls showed the typical phenomenon of difficulty in disengaging from fear. Our study is the first to demonstrate the separable effects of amygdala damage on engagement and disengagement of spatial attention. The findings indicate that multiple mechanisms contribute in biasing attention towards fear, which vary in their timing and dependence on amygdala integrity. It seems that the amygdala is not essential for rapid attention to emotion, but probably has a role in assessment of biological relevance.
Highlights
Evolutionary pressure ensures that in systems with limited perceptual capacity, stimuli that indicate potential environmental dangers receive privileged access to resources (Dolan, 2002; O€ hman & Mineka, 2001)
Numerous studies show that attention is preferentially oriented towards and maintained for longer by threat-related items (Yiend, 2010). Such attentional bias has been documented using a variety of stimuli (Yiend, 2010) and evidence shows that threat-related stimuli affect both engagement and disengagement components of attention (Cisler, Bacon, & Williams, 2009; Koster, Crombez, Van Damme, Verschuere, & De Houwer, 2004; Yiend, 2010)
Our results reveal for the first time the separable effects of amygdala damage on engagement and disengagement components of spatial attention
Summary
Evolutionary pressure ensures that in systems with limited perceptual capacity, stimuli that indicate potential environmental dangers receive privileged access to resources (Dolan, 2002; O€ hman & Mineka, 2001). Numerous studies show that attention is preferentially oriented towards and maintained for longer by threat-related items (Yiend, 2010). Such attentional bias has been documented using a variety of stimuli (e.g., facial expressions, words, scenes) (Yiend, 2010) and evidence shows that threat-related stimuli affect both engagement and disengagement components of attention (Cisler, Bacon, & Williams, 2009; Koster, Crombez, Van Damme, Verschuere, & De Houwer, 2004; Yiend, 2010). The precise neural mechanisms that underlie attentional bias towards threat-related stimuli remain unclear
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
