Abstract

It is widely believed that the spin of black holes in X-ray binaries is mainly natal. A significant spin-up from accretion is not possible. If the secondary has a low mass, the black hole spin cannot change too much even if the black hole swallows the whole stellar companion. If the secondary has a high mass, its lifetime is too short to transfer the necessary amount of matter and spin the black hole up. However, while black holes formed from the collapse of a massive star with Solar metallicity are expected to have low birth spin, current spin measurements show that some black holes in X-ray binaries are rotating very rapidly. Here I show that, if these objects are not the Kerr black holes of general relativity, the accretion of a small amount of matter ($\sim 2$~$M_\odot$) can make them look like very fast-rotating Kerr black holes. Such a possibility is not in contradiction with any observation and it can explain current spin measurements in a very simple way.

Highlights

  • When a star exhausts all its nuclear fuel, it shrinks to find a new equilibrium configuration

  • We show that current spin measurements can be explained if black hole (BH) candidates in X-ray binaries are not the Kerr BHs of general relativity

  • We showed that current spin measurements of BHs in X-ray binaries may be explained if these objects are more prolate than the predictions of general relativity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When a star exhausts all its nuclear fuel, it shrinks to find a new equilibrium configuration. It is thought that in our Galaxy there are about 107 BHs formed from the gravitational collapse of massive stars Despite this huge number, we only know about 20 stellar-mass BH candidates [1]. We only know about 20 stellar-mass BH candidates [1] They live in X-ray binaries and from the study of the orbital motion of the stellar companion it is possible to infer that the mass of the compact object exceeds 3 M. It is commonly thought that the spin of stellar-mass BHs in X-ray binaries is mainly natal and that the effect of the accretion process is negligible [7] A BH cannot swallow more than a few M from the companion star, and for a 10 M object this is not enough to significantly change its spin parameter a∗ [7]

22 Page 2 of 6
Kerr black holes
MSun 9 MSun
22 Page 4 of 6
Concluding remarks
22 Page 6 of 6
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call