Abstract
Simple SummaryHerbivorous insects and plants greatly affected each other’s evolution due to their close interactions. This resulted in the development of a variety of adaptations on both sides. Through the need for protection against herbivorous insects, surfaces with lower attachment ability evolved in many plants. As a response, the attachment systems of insects have developed numerous specializations. Stick insects (Phasmatodea) have an attachment system, consisting of paired claws, arolium (attachment pad between the claws) and euplantulae (paired attachment pads on the tarsomeres), which is well adapted to different natural surfaces. We used measurements of pull-off and traction force in two species (Medauroidea extradentata and Sungaya inexpectata) representing the most common microstructures used for attachment within stick insects (nubby and smooth) to quantify the attachment ability of Phasmatodea on natural surfaces. Plant leaves with different surface properties (smooth, trichome-covered, hydrophilic and covered with crystalline waxes) were selected as substrates. Wax-crystal-covered fine-roughness substrates revealed the lowest, whereas strongly structured substrates showed the highest attachment performance among the stick insects studied. Removing the claws of the insects resulted in lower attachment ability on structured substrates. Furthermore, claw removal revealed that the attachment performance of the pads is less reduced by contaminating wax crystals in the species with nubby attachment structures. Long-lasting effects of the leaves on the attachment ability were briefly investigated, but not confirmed.Herbivorous insects and plants exemplify a longstanding antagonistic coevolution, resulting in the development of a variety of adaptations on both sides. Some plant surfaces evolved features that negatively influence the performance of the attachment systems of insects, which adapted accordingly as a response. Stick insects (Phasmatodea) have a well-adapted attachment system with paired claws, pretarsal arolium and tarsal euplantulae. We measured the attachment ability of Medauroidea extradentata with smooth surface on the euplantulae and Sungaya inexpectata with nubby microstructures of the euplantulae on different plant substrates, and their pull-off and traction forces were determined. These species represent the two most common euplantulae microstructures, which are also the main difference between their respective attachment systems. The measurements were performed on selected plant leaves with different properties (smooth, trichome-covered, hydrophilic and covered with crystalline waxes) representing different types among the high diversity of plant surfaces. Wax-crystal-covered substrates with fine roughness revealed the lowest, whereas strongly structured substrates showed the highest attachment ability of the Phasmatodea species studied. Removal of the claws caused lower attachment due to loss of mechanical interlocking. Interestingly, the two species showed significant differences without claws on wax-crystal-covered leaves, where the individuals with nubby euplantulae revealed stronger attachment. Long-lasting effects of the leaves on the attachment ability were briefly investigated, but not confirmed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.