Abstract

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) enable users to control a computer by using pure brain activity. Recent BCIs based on visual evoked potentials (VEPs) have shown to be suitable for high-speed communication. However, all recent high-speed BCIs are synchronous, which means that the system works with fixed time slots so that the user is not able to select a command at his own convenience, which poses a problem in real-world applications. In this paper, we present the first asynchronous high-speed BCI with robust distinction between intentional control (IC) and non-control (NC), with a nearly perfect NC state detection of only 0.075 erroneous classifications per minute. The resulting asynchronous speller achieved an average information transfer rate (ITR) of 122.7 bit/min using a 32 target matrix-keyboard. Since the method is based on random stimulation patterns it allows to use an arbitrary number of targets for any application purpose, which was shown by using an 55 target German QWERTZ-keyboard layout which allowed the participants to write an average of 16.1 (up to 30.7) correct case-sensitive letters per minute. As the presented system is the first asynchronous high-speed BCI speller with a robust non-control state detection, it is an important step for moving BCI applications out of the lab and into real-life.

Highlights

  • Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) enable users to control a computer by using brain activity

  • It consists of a presentation layer representing a keyboard, an EEG recorder/amplifier, and the asynchronous model that predicts the user-intended target in real-time

  • By determining a user-specific threshold, it is detected if the user wants to control the BCI or if the BCI should remain in a non-control state

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) enable users to control a computer by using brain activity. Recent BCI spellers are mainly based on event related potentials (ERPs) or visual evoked potentials (VEPs). The latter are brain responses to visual stimuli and the idea has been proposed by Sutter in 19841, who stated that “the electrical scalp response to a modulated target is largest if the target is located within the central 1° of the visual field” and that “this makes it possible to construct a gaze-controlled keyboard”. Like Cecotti[15] who developed an asynchronous SSVEP BCI distinguishing between IC state and NC state by normalizing frequency powers for each stimulus frequency following a minimum energy combination approach. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to S.N. (email: nagels@ informatik.uni-tuebingen.de) www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call