Abstract

Human vision is heterogeneous around the visual field. At a fixed eccentricity, performance is better along the horizontal than the vertical meridian and along the lower than the upper vertical meridian. These asymmetric patterns, termed performance fields, have been found in numerous visual tasks, including those mediated by contrast sensitivity and spatial resolution. However, it is unknown whether spatial resolution asymmetries are confined to the cardinal meridians or whether and how far they extend into the upper and lower hemifields. Here, we measured visual acuity at isoeccentric peripheral locations (10 deg eccentricity), every 15° of polar angle. On each trial, observers judged the orientation (± 45°) of one of four equidistant, suprathreshold grating stimuli varying in spatial frequency (SF). On each block, we measured performance as a function of stimulus SF at 4 of 24 isoeccentric locations. We estimated the 75%-correct SF threshold, SF cutoff point (i.e., chance-level), and slope of the psychometric function for each location. We found higher SF estimates (i.e., better acuity) for the horizontal than the vertical meridian and for the lower than the upper vertical meridian. These asymmetries were most pronounced at the cardinal meridians and decreased gradually as the angular distance from the vertical meridian increased. This gradual change in acuity with polar angle reflected a shift of the psychometric function without changes in slope. The same pattern was found under binocular and monocular viewing conditions. These findings advance our understanding of visual processing around the visual field and help constrain models of visual perception.

Highlights

  • Visual perception is not uniform across the visual field

  • No difference in the slope estimates of the psychometric functions was observed (Figure 4c; F(3, 39) < 1). These results indicate that both the Horizontal vertical anisotropy (HVA) and vertical meridian asymmetry (VMA) reflect shifts of the psychometric functions without change in shape (Figure 2b)

  • We used linear mixed-effects models to predict spatial frequency (SF) estimates based on the angular distance from the vertical meridian (VM), with participants as a random effect. We found that both SF threshold and SF cutoff estimates increased as the angular distance from the VM increased

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Visual performance decreases as eccentricity increases (Cannon, 1985; Carrasco, Evert, Chang, & Katz, 1995; Rijsdijk, Kroon, & van der Wildt, 1980; Thibos, Cheney, & Walsh, 1987), and varies across isoeccentric locations as a function of polar angle, a pattern referred to as visual performance fields (Altpeter, Mackeben, & Trauzettel-Klosinski, 2000; Cameron, Tai, & Carrasco, 2002; Carrasco, Talgar, & Cameron, 2001; Mackeben, 1999).

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.